Films/DVD Asylum

Movies from comedy to drama to your favorite Hollyweird Star.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

Good points. Not a perfect thing.

Posted by free.ranger on June 28, 2016 at 09:36:33:
I was wondering who might have been better than Laurie, but second guessing is part of critical review. I thought his fake lightness and chatter was good personality context to carry within it his sociopathic deadliness. Calling his sadistic killer bodyguards Frisky and Tabby was genius, showing this false demeanor to the n-th degree. Pretty good stuff IMO.
Pulling Hiddleston into the fold was plausible. Replacing the top man in the group with him was not, but that is the basis for the story. You have to buy in.
I took some of the lucky coincidences of the end as showing how far ahead Pine was of Roper in the head games dept. Even the very end, when the Egyptian "businessmen" jumped the cops to take Roper away for justice. An unauthorized prearrangement by Pine that surprised everyone.
I didn't want to stop watching a minute of it, and I use that to gage how good this was. I think very.