Video Asylum

TVs, VCRs, DVD players, Home Theater systems and more.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

RE: Nice try, but again you're twisting on your own petard.

Posted by Jazz Inmate on September 1, 2007 at 09:42:49:
>> In order for DVD to have been a factor in laser disc's niche status it would've had to have been around and competing against it's larger cousin from 1985 onward. <<

Bullshit. CD was being marketed very successfully. The promise of a smaller optical video disc had arrived. The writing was on the wall. To supplant VHS, the industry needed something compact with the potential of recording. Laserdisc wasn't going to do the trick.

>> Let me make this perfectly clear: by 1985 LD was a niche product. <<

Yes, and the reason was that the industry didn't get behind it to develop it and market it the way it would have needed to target the mass consumer. Why do YOU think that is?

>> So you see, LD was in direct competition with VHS & Beta initially. <<

Bullshit. No consumer interested in VHS or beta ever said, "maybe I should get Laserdisc instead.

>> You realize Jazz, that I should be charging you for this history lesson, but because it's late and I still have a little ale left, I'll be generous! ;0) <<

You're like a bad wiki narrator.

>> You seem to suffer from long term memory loss, dude, or maybe you're just too young to remember. You keep refering to events no more than 7 or 8 years past, and you're stuck on the idea that the advent of DVD somehow created LD niche status, but that's impossible. Let me repeat: LD was a niche product well over 10 years before the advent of DVDs; you can't rewrite history. <<

I know you and racerguy would like to erect strawmen and knock them over, but the fact is that my position is that the promise of a more elegant optical format, DVD, made it silly for the industry to get behind Laserdisc in any way that would make it anything but a niche product. Is that clear enough for you?

>> Heck, I still have laser discs in my collection and a Pioneer unit capable of playing them! <<

Yeah, you also have photos of yourself with long hair and leather pants 30 yrs after it went out of style.

>> I was buying Japanese import LDs back in the late 80's because many titles I sought weren't issued here. Even back then it was clear that some newer technology, probably similar to CDs and using a laser would replace LD, but that isn't the reason folks shied away from the format. <<

What can I say, auph. You had a great deal of disposable income, as most of us here do. But the overwhelming majority couldn't afford Laserdisc if they wanted to and the only way it was going to come down in price or beecome the studios' format of choice is if the electronics manufacturers really wanted to develop and push it. They didn't. Why? Because they needed a more elegant technology and they knew it was coming. Compact disc was taking over the audio market and the promise of a more compact optical video disc was here.
-------------
"I have found that if you love life, life will love you back." -Arthur Rubinstein (1887-1982)