Video Asylum

TVs, VCRs, DVD players, Home Theater systems and more.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

depends on what you're comparing

Posted by Joe Murphy Jr on September 12, 2007 at 18:04:03:
If it's the immersion factor, obviously a 100" image beats a smaller size screen -- regardless of technology. If it's the 3D/life-like look, plasma is still the holder of that title -- again, regardless of technology.

If the cost for Panasonic's 103" plasma and their projector (with a 100" screen) were the same, I think we'd be looking at a unanimous decision when it came time to put money down. And I seriously doubt there'd be many going home with the 2-piece option.