|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
75.80.176.22
In Reply to: RE: Hahhh. $4K and its lifespan is fairly limited..... posted by Carl G on October 05, 2017 at 19:08:00
...are precisely the reason I've sworn off expensive TV's. Guess if you watch a lot of movies it might be worth it to you. In contrast expensive TV's don't make network sitcoms any funnier or NCIS any less tedious.
Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution inevitable.- JFK
Edits: 10/05/17Follow Ups:
Been looking at some of the $800-$1,200 4K 65" TV's at Sam's. Not ready to replace my plasma yet so just window shopping.
Noticed several have HDR and "120 motion rate". If you dig deep enough, that seems it's a way to disguise 60hz refresh rate. Is that true?
...I simply wouldn't consider one with a refresh rate less than 120Hz. Well, I had no worries with my Panasonic since the refresh rate was something like 600Hz. My new Sony LED TV has a refresh rate of (the horrors) 60Hz. Don't notice any motion artifacts at all. So I'm guessing it's more of a matter of the video processing circuitry, than just the refresh rate.
Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution inevitable.- JFK
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: