Films/DVD Asylum

Movies from comedy to drama to your favorite Hollyweird Star.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

RE: Blockbusters "suck" because of the general subject matter: no

Posted by Analog Scott on November 24, 2007 at 09:55:01:
>> matter the director or the length.>>

Laurence of Arabia sucked? The Godfather sucked?

> They have snot-nosed test audiences? Only if that's the target audience, Scott.>

Sadly it is. They are the ones going to the movies these days.

> Not all directors are able to make audience pleasing films as well as "artistic" ones.>

The great ones often succeed.

>> Producers aren't in the business of supporting directors' egos: it's an industry. Like all parents, directors think everything about their child is precious.>>

Yes but that does not make the business model an ideal. You seem to think the producers have no ego in this whole thing. That IMO is the problem. Their egos are getting in the way.

>> "Apocalypse, Now" is a prefect example of a bloated director making a ridiculously long film: the producer could have cut another half an hour with no loss; adding another hour made it fatter than Brando.>>

Apocalypse now is not an example of anything. It as unique as it gets. It was a happy accident. there have been a few.

>> But, anyhow, you're only involved with pulp anyway, right?>>

No. My last three films were Skin, Redblet and Paraiso Travel. Hardly Hollywood blockbuster material.

>> 300 and Sin City, weren't they?>>

300 yes. I had nothing to do with Sin City. 300 is a prime example of bucking the studio system. We were low budget enough that WB largely stayed out of our way. we were lucky enough to stack the test screenings so no cuts were actually made. you might note that there is no director's cut being sold in the case of 300. that is because what was released was the actual directors cut. No changes were made thanks to the amazing scores in the test screanings. the amazing scores were due in no small part to the infaltration of Frank Miller fans who had a particular appreciation for the film's fidelity to the graphic novel. hope that helps clear things up for you.