Home
AudioAsylum Trader
Films/DVD Asylum

Movies from comedy to drama to your favorite Hollyweird Star.

For Sale Ads

FAQ / News / Events

 

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.

You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login


Login to access features only available to registered Asylum Inmates.
    By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username:

The Name that you picked or by default, your email.
Forgot Moniker?

 
 

Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".

Password:    

Forgot Password?

 Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:  
Your Email:  
Subject:  

Message Comments

   

Original Message

"Sugar"-technical question.

Posted by powermatic on June 7, 2009 at 17:46:47:

There's a long Steadycam tracking shot in this movie following (behind) the protagonist out of his motel, down the street, through some kind of arcade, to a bowling alley. Nothing that unusual in that regard, but what was interesting was the extremely short depth of field throughout the shot-for all intents and purposes the only object in the sweet spot was the hero's back. That is until the bowling alley, when depth of field increases to include a group of people in the distance (there might have been a cut at that point-I don't remember one, but I can't say for sure).

The question is, what lens/technique did they use for this? I'm thinking a short focal length, opened up wide, but I'd be curious to know. And how would the DOF be increased at one point without an edit?

The movie was shot on film, btw, not video, so I'd guess that computer manipulation isn't the answer. And the shot was effective for it's apparent purpose-to accentuate the character's sense of isolation in a foreign land.



"dammit"