Video Asylum

TVs, VCRs, DVD players, Home Theater systems and more.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

why would anyone root for HD-DVD at the expense of Blu-Ray....

Posted by oscar on June 7, 2007 at 07:14:34:
....other than the early adopters who invested in HD-DVD ? Blu-Ray has higher storage capacity and higher video/audio bandwidth/bitrate capability which translates into higher picture and sound quality, everything else being equal.

One example: "KIng Kong" became a reference disc for PQ but they didn't have the room to put a 24 bit lossless audio track and still put in the frills at the same time. The same video encoding on a 50G Blu-Ray would also have allowed the lossless audio track, and probably in multiple languages and/or with added frills. I'm also hearing complains about "Blood Diamond", with less than stellar PQ based on low-bit rate VC-1 encode and perhaps indifferent TLC by the video encoders/compressionists. The reason for the low bit rate encode ? Probably the 30G HD-DVD limitations.

The arguments for HD-DVD ? Okay they have IME and interactive internet capability I wouldn't couldn't care less about in the HT room. Okay, In a year's time, I expect Blu-Ray to have a similar feature set when they get BD-J etc... worked out.

HD-DVD mandated TrueHD in all their players. 5.1 TrueHD IS a capability I'd like to have, but I expect future Blu-Ray players are going to support 5.1 TrueHD simply to keep up with the competition. I'd expect in a years time, the only Blu-Ray players without TrueHD will be the bottom-of-the-line Wal-mart specials for the customers who wouldn't appreciate TrueHD anyway. You'd better believe my next player(s)/prepro will have TrueHD decoding ability. In the meantime, I'll "make-do" with the uncompressed LPCM tracks I get with the Sony/Buena Vista releases; even the Fox DTS HD MA (with core 1.5M DTS) discs are very good.

HD-DVD players are cheaper. I fully expect Blu-Ray to be just as cheap when Economies of Scale start to kick in. Keep in mind we are still in low-sales volume mode.

Not enough 50G Blu-ray discs to go around to take advantage of that storage capacity ? I doubt this is an issue at current sales volumes, even if it is, it's only temporary as Sony is gradually cranking up the manufacturing capabilities.

The real advantage Blu-Ray has is exclusive studio support from Sony, Fox, and Disney. HD-DVD has exclusive support only from Universal (if Universal goes format neutral, the format war is decided). Combine this with a technically superior format and you have to wonder why anyone thinks HD-DVD has a shot at pre-empting Blu-Ray ? Or why anyone would even want both formats to survive if the format war is keep shoppers away ?

HD-DVD got the early start and still has an advantage in available frills (e.g. IME), but this is only a temporary advantage. The early sales advantage HD-DVD had initially has disappeared and Blu-Ray now has the edge in software sales.