Films/DVD Asylum

LOL!

209.190.32.6

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Films/DVD Asylum ] [ FAQ ]

TAFKA Steve

In Reply to: to qote Star Trek IV ... posted by Mart on June 19, 1999 at 11:12:57:

Luckily, I didn't even bring up the subject of "Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me" and "Dune".

Follow Ups:

Re: Dune Estes 15:45:07 6/21/99 (5)
Dune is a tough book to turn into a movie, waaaaaay too much detail. It takes a certain skill to pull it off. I had read all the books and still found the movie confusing. By the way the author of Dune thought the movie was great! Go figure.
- wHaT ?!?! Mart 20:25:39 6/21/99 (4)
  Dune's author actually liked that self-indulgent pile of excrement? It was the only time I felt bad for the environment poluting chemicals being wasted on celluloid.
  The parts I actually stayed awake (& have never fell asleep on a movie before) for reeked, BADly!
  - Re:What & Dune Estes 11:51:52 6/22/99 (3)
    Yes, that what was said in a SF fanize at the time. I am not arguing with you that Dune was badly done. I am saying the books were better than the movie.
    - Redid the book explain why ... Mart 19:59:06 6/22/99 (2)
      their eyes glowed ultra-blue intermittantly?
      PS: Try reading "Blade" some time. It had nearly nothing in common with the movie & was far superior.
      - Re:did the book explain why ... Estes 21:58:55 7/01/99 (1)
        
        In Reply to: Redid the book explain why ... posted by Mart on June 22, 1999 at 19:59:06:
        
        Actually it did, it was from the use of "spice". In a book you can explain such things.
        
        did the book telegraph the story as much? (nt) Mart 08:27:38 7/02/99 (0)
        
        In Reply to: Re:did the book explain why ... posted by Estes on July 01, 1999 at 21:58:55:
Can you say "Alan Smithee.";-) (nt) Tom S. 07:55:42 6/20/99 (0)
fake name to avoid being credited

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

McShane Design

You can not post to an archived thread.