Films/DVD Asylum

wHaT ?!?!

155.218.171.242

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Films/DVD Asylum ] [ FAQ ]

In Reply to: Re: Dune posted by Estes on June 21, 1999 at 15:45:07:

Dune's author actually liked that self-indulgent pile of excrement? It was the only time I felt bad for the environment poluting chemicals being wasted on celluloid.
The parts I actually stayed awake (& have never fell asleep on a movie before) for reeked, BADly!

Follow Ups:

Re:What & Dune Estes 11:51:52 6/22/99 (3)
Yes, that what was said in a SF fanize at the time. I am not arguing with you that Dune was badly done. I am saying the books were better than the movie.
- Redid the book explain why ... Mart 19:59:06 6/22/99 (2)
  their eyes glowed ultra-blue intermittantly?
  PS: Try reading "Blade" some time. It had nearly nothing in common with the movie & was far superior.
  - Re:did the book explain why ... Estes 21:58:55 7/01/99 (1)
    Actually it did, it was from the use of "spice". In a book you can explain such things.
    - did the book telegraph the story as much? (nt) Mart 08:27:38 7/02/99 (0)

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Kimber Kable

You can not post to an archived thread.