 
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
|
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
Yeah, I know, corny, corny...Actually, last night was the first time I saw it in its entirety. Before it's been all bits and pieces.
The reason? Why, simple... it was in HDTV on ABC.
They always mention the beautiful color photography of that film, and most of us have never had chance to experience it, as many have only seen it on our regular TV'.
Take my word - it is BREATHTAKING in HDTV. Enough so that I dropped everything and watched the whlle corny thing.
My dream now is to catch My Fair Lady in HDTV. And then - Barry Lyndon. Then I'll be a happy man. I may even stop watching those VHS tapes...
Follow Ups:
link
:o)
Courtesy of the latimes.com...December 19, 2002 Cable, TV Companies Reach Deal on HDTV
By Jon Healey, Times Staff WriterCable operators and TV manufacturers have struck a long-awaited agreement designed to make it easier for consumers to get high-definition television from cable, ensure their ability to record most digital programs and preserve the value of older HDTV sets.
The deal, which is expected to be announced today, would open the door for cable-ready digital TV sets that could deliver HDTV without a separate set-top box. This kind of plug-and-play simplicity is crucial for digital TV, set manufacturers say, because about two-thirds of U.S. homes rely on cable to deliver their TV signals.
"If we can cross this hurdle, I think we can really open the floodgates for consumer interest" in digital TV, said David H. Arland, director of government and public relations for Thomson Multimedia, which owns the RCA brand.
The deal won't take effect, however, unless the Federal Communications Commission adopts a regulation applying the agreement to all cable and satellite operators. At least some of the provisions are expected to draw opposition from satellite companies, TV programmers and Hollywood studios, which were excluded from the private negotiations between cable operators and set makers.
Representatives of the cable operators' and manufacturers' trade associations declined to discuss the deal, which took more than five months to negotiate.
One likely sticking point involves the scrambling of HDTV signals. The proposed regulation would effectively bar cable and satellite operators from scrambling the signals all the way to the TV set, according to sources close to the negotiations. End-to-end scrambling would help guard programs against piracy -- a key goal for the studios and networks -- but it also would prevent older HDTV sets from displaying them.
Consumer electronics manufacturers and cable operators have battled for years over how to make TVs work with all U.S. cable systems, which use a variety of incompatible techniques to scramble channels and deter piracy. The FCC stepped in four years ago, ordering cable operators to develop standardized security modules that could be plugged into any TV set or converter box with a matching slot.
That order has borne little fruit, mainly because set makers balked at the conditions cable operators wanted to place on using the modules. But FCC efforts to spur the transition to digital TV helped drive the parties back to the negotiating table.
The overall thrust of the agreement is simple: to let manufacturers sell basic digital TV sets that can receive all cable channels -- including ones carrying HDTV programs -- through a simple wall connection. Video on demand and other interactive services would still require a set-top box, although future talks may pave the way for more advanced cable-ready digital TVs.
Sources close to the negotiations said the two sides grappled with complex issues concern- ing how digital shows are recorded, transmitted and protected against piracy.
Cable operators ultimately agreed to numerous limits on the security measures they can impose, sources said, but only if the FCC imposes the same limits on satellite operators. That way, cable operators wouldn't risk losing programs -- and customers -- to their top competitors, Hughes Electronics Corp.'s DirecTV and EchoStar Communications Corp.'s Dish Network.
Sources outlined the following provisions of the deal, which may prove to be the most controversial:
* Analog connectors. The vast majority of the 4 million digital TV sets and monitors already sold to consumers rely on analog sockets to connect to cable and satellite boxes. Unlike digital connectors, analog inputs can't handle a scrambled signal.
The cable industry had wanted to let programmers send some HDTV shows to sets with only digital connections, a feature of the newest digital TVs. But the agreement calls for the FCC to prevent cable and satellite operators from doing that.
* Downgraded HDTV signals. Instead of turning off analog connectors, some programmers had sought to limit the picture quality of signals sent to those inputs in order to deter pirates from copying HDTV shows.
The proposed regulation would bar cable and satellite operators from downgrading any program that also was available over the air for free. It also would make it difficult to downgrade other programs.
* Recording restrictions. The proposed regulation would allow consumers to make at least one copy of most programs, with the main exception being those delivered via pay-per-view and video-on-demand services. Programs that cannot be copied could still be delayed as long as 90 minutes by viewers with personal video recorders such as those made by TiVo Inc., which store programs on a hard drive instead of videotape.
The deal would let programmers petition the FCC to tighten the recording restrictions. In addition, approaches to programming based on new business models could have more restrictive recording rules, but the FCC would have to put any complaints on a fast track and take consumers' reasonable expectations into account.
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-cable19dec19001433.story
I could be a grin future. But I imagine "more the same", which we alread have. But, I still wonder, what TV would be like if the networks were ever full granted their "no recording, period" wish. This has been their aim from the beginning.!
-Aaron
Yes, the HD picture is absolutely breathtaking, even on material you might otherwise not watch. In addition to prime time programs and movies on the major networks I catch myself watching Mark Cuban's HDNet now and then for music performances, nature documentaries and even the occasional travelog! Widescreen HD is hard to beat.BTW, what model (direct view, rear screen, front projection, LCD, Plasma, DLP, etc.) did you buy, if you don't mind my asking?
AuPh
I have had the HDTV for well over two years now, but there has been nothing to watch, so I simply used it as a regular TV, to watch the tapes - imagine that! Receiving the HD signal over the air has been highly problematic at my location, with tall trees around. The picture would be there for few minutes, then fade away. So I simply boxed my HD receiver and never looked back. But at least I knew what it was like, and what to look forward to.Some time ago my cable company started transmitting the HD signals, and we got their service. There are now three HDTV channels included in the "somewhat-basic" service. I don't pay for premium services, as you might know (No Money For Hollywood!).
We used to have the Toshiba 34" direct view HDTV up to now, and I loved it, but it was way toooooooo bulky for my wife's taste. So recently we got the 50" Pioneer 5030 plasma that I hung on the wall, just to keep her happy.
If you are a real stickler, you can always see some misconvergence on the best CRT screen. And of course plasma doesn't have it, making it even more enjoyable. Both the Toshiba and the plasma present beautiful HD pictures, I really don't know which flavor I would keep if I lived in an ideal world. To me plasma always "beautifies" the images, but I don't mind that all that much.
We've owned a direct view 38" HDTV (RCA) for about a year and a half and while I haven't noticed any convergence problems, on some programming there is a slight squeezing of the picture on the extreme right and left sides; it's almost unnoticeable, but I think it's inherrent in most if not all direct view WS sets. When you talk about misconvergence I think about 3 tube CRT projectors (front & rearscreen). I used to own a 46" SONY rearscreen (standard 4:3 academy format) and spent hours learning how to adjust the internal pots ...and probably voiding the manufacturer's warranty in the process :o)... just to eliminate niggling convergence errors.BTW, I do like the Plasma monitors in spite of the slightly artificial "more real than real" picture quality (i.e., "beutified" image as you called it), but they seem a wee bit overpriced. Oh well, it's to be expected with cutting edge technology, right? Anyway, the thinness of plasma monitors are a big plus and as long as one is careful to avoid a burn-in scenario (i.e., where a paused still-frame picture actually burns an image onto the screen) the plasmas offer theoretical longevity at least five times that of conventional CRTs!
It's nice to see that cable companies are finally beginning to offer HD programming; in our area we switched from cable to DirectView satellite sevice because our cable company kept making promises but failed to deliver.
Cheers,
AuPh
Don't get me wrong, my wife and I both enjoyed this immensely-I was just dissapointed it wasn't framed properly, especially since ABC managed to show the godawful Mrs. Doubtfire in OAR the night before.See the link for illustrations of the framing of Sound of Music- I think it was filmed in Todd AO, which is roughly 2:2 aspect.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
