![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: Re: The point of having no point posted by RGA on March 14, 2004 at 20:32:46:
I don't get it. You said there was no story... then you provided somethng that looked like a pretty substantial story to me - a far more a story than many the movies are based on - he-he... what's the foundation of the Lost in Translation, if you need the War and Peace size story in every film?... and then you said that was not story enough.Like many other such stories, the Fellini's one was not too deep perhaps, but PERSONAL. To say it was irrelevant is to say Fellini himself is irrelevant, which is something someone here already said once. OK as a one person's opinion, not light enough to float.
Fellini is one of the pilars of the modern movie, and as such all his stories are relevant to the viewer.
However, all that is simply a response to your demand for something behind the beautiful acting and presentation - sort fo playing along with you, without agreeing. As I said, I don't *really* need a story - I watch the mastery of expressive means. There were tons of it in that film.
You avoided my analogy of the simple Chardin painting, apparently because you couldn't answer it properly. Does Chardin keep you riveted for 2 hours? It sure does me. Does it keep you coming back? It does that to me.
The world of art is full of the "pointless" works you seem so critical about. Most opera is based on something that would seem like a rather silly small story if taken all by itself. Much of classical music falls into the same category. Is it the theme that makes the Beethoven's 3rd a great symphony? Or his Pastoral one? By no means.
Fellini is a master painter. Like paintings by Corot or Hobbema some of his works might *seemingly* lack the plots, but his works are NOT "films about nothing" - far from it, they are films about people, to whom love and suffering are not really "nothing". So a story of a prostitute who lost her illusions might be "nothing" to you, to me it is a deep human tragedy, masterfully told.
![]()
![]()
Follow Ups:
I'm not saying a film has to be about huge social issues. Lost in Translation was about a middle aged man in a marriage that is SORT of happy. His career is in the dump forcing him to Japan to make adverts. He hates himself for pandering to the dollar. Johanssen is a young girl at the beginning of her road in a marriage she thinks is a mistake - she's probably right.Fellini's film is all EGO. His creative block he posts to the screen. I have no problem with the premise if it had been handled competantly with character development.
There is no relation whatsoever to paintings so I didn't really respond to it. 81/2 didn't move me in any way exceopt make me feel anger toward the Director for being an ego-maniac.
I'm sure it was personal it was about him. Suffering? Yeah I'm sure he was hurting financially after his career. Suffering because he couldn't think of a fresh story is hardly suffering. To the artist it might be suffering but snort some coke or take Laudinum like all the other artists who have blocks and stop whining to me.
One person's opinion? Well if people actually saw this movie - if it did remotely anything at the box office and wasn't coveted by a small group of Art film fans this film would have ended up in the dung heap.
But then there are people who actually think The Great Gatsby was a good book too or theat Leo Tolstoy was more than just a long winded romance novelist.
![]()
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: