Audio Asylum Thread Printer

Get a view of an entire thread on one page

FAQ / News / Events

Films/DVD Asylum

"I'm afraid it's going to amount to a 'colorized version' (in the Turneresque sense) of the original and nothing more."

67.173.212.229

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Thread: Display All Email ] [ Films/DVD Asylum ]

Audiophilander

In Reply to: Re: Kong-King-- dubious doings posted by halfnote on October 31, 2005 at 20:16:01:

The difference:
Psycho was intended as a B&W film and will always work best that way due to the noirish atmosphere and desolate, nightmarish location. King Kong, OTOH, almost begged to have color from the outset, but not "colorized" & "updated" version as DeLaurintis travesty. With smooth realistic effects, camera mobility, DTS sound and an almost limitless budget to film his vision, an accomplished Director of Mr. Jackson's caliber should achieve an involving re-envisioning of the original story. In fact, the new version will probably be much longer than the original Kong with additional scenes and story content perhaps only hinted at in the 1933 film.
Peter Jackson seems to have a great deal of respect for the original Kong and having axchieved so much with LoTR I don't believe that his version will take anything away from the reverence accorded the 1933 film. Sharing that reverence for the original I'll purchase the box set of the restored/remastered King Kong, Son of Kong and Mighty Joe Young later this month when the DVD's are released, but I'm also planning to attend Mr. Jackson's film on openning weekend.
AuPh

Follow Ups:

Re: "I'm afraid it's going to amount to a 'colorized version' (in the Turneresque sense) of the original and nothing mor - halfnote 21:42:10 11/01/05 (0)
I hope you're right. And I agree that Peter Jackson is a very capable director. But sometimes more is less, and the new Kong is rumored to be running about 3 hours. We'll see if he manages to capture the poetry of the original, which shines though all of its quaintness and creakiness.
And you points with regard to Psycho are well taken. It's true that modern cinematic technology has much more to offer a King Kong than a Psycho. Yet I don't see that Psycho had to be a black and white film, even though it was intended to be. North by Northwest didn't suffer too much from being in color.
But one of the absolute WORST, and most eagerly anticipated, remakes ever made (it was SOOO bad, it qualifies as one of the worst MOVIES ever made, let alone remakes) was another classic monster thriller ...
GODZILLA. All the cinematic wizardry and sound effects couldn't stop this overstuffed turkey from falling off the bone. Now, I'll grant you that Godzilla had the feeling of a movie that was scripted in an afternoon "brainstorming session" by a couple of Hollywood marketing hot shots who could smell box office. And Jackson's handling of the Ring Trilogy might give one cause for some hope. But something seems to happen when these fragile relics of old taken out of their display cases and passed around, disected, and "improved" upon.
I wonder if there's something in the time, the ethos of the era, in which movies like Kong were made that just won't translate into our modern vernacular.
But, like so many of us, I am eagerly awaiting the release of this film. Again, I hope you're right about it, and that Jackson can succeed where almost everyone else seems to fail.

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Parts Connexion

You can not post to an archived thread.