![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
207.238.190.31
In Reply to: Polanski's Oliver Twist posted by dave c on June 21, 2006 at 14:31:39:
According to the "Making Of" documentary that came with my rental copy, the scenery was all newly-built (and not painted backdrops). Only in one instance--the long shot down the main street--was a "blue screen" placed at the end of the street, allowing for additional architecture not in the budget. The rest of the buildings and locales were real and pretty believable, I thought.The problem I had with the Oliver was not his accent, but his rather flat emotional demeanor. He seemed fairly "inert" througout most of the movie. A comparison with the Oliver from the classic David Lean production of 1948 will demonstrate this kid's shortcomings.
As for Ben Kingsley's Fagin, I didn't find it all that bad, certainly not on the level of a "pantomime".
All in all, an enjoyable rendition of this classic, but I really want to see the David Lean version again (currently not available on DVD?).
![]()
Follow Ups:
Does that mean the view of St. Paul's in the background is in some way real?
Given the nearground is not in LOndon it seems unlikely...
I did not mean KIngsley was bad as Fagin... within the form of the film he was good, but it was not a film that seemed to aim for "real" in my opinion.
Yes, it would be good to compare the Lean version, especially the late scenes where Bill Sykes is cornered. I seem to remember some of the shots as being more or less identical.
Oliver himself seems somewhat flat.
I actually thought it could be to allow young viewers to identify more easily with him.
![]()
The image of St Paul's that you see in the distance is being projected (or however they do it) on the blue/green screen. Everything else in front of it is a real set that was built on the studio lot.
![]()
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: