|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
96.41.90.91
In Reply to: RE: Watched his Hang Them High last night posted by Victor Khomenko on January 15, 2019 at 10:10:38
all I could think of while I watched the beautifully photographed drama unfold was Kubrick really did cast the wrong guy for the lead in this epic! According to IMDB, he originally wanted Redford but he turned it down... Though I am not a huge fan of Redford he IS a more talented actor than Ryan O'Neal... I'm sure Kubrick was ultimately disappointed with Eyes Wide Shut AND Cruise AND Kidman it is without a doubt all three of their worst films....
Follow Ups:
I thought O'Neal was perfect for the role. Redford is also a pretty boy but not as snotty as O'Neal. Just my 2 cents.
Considering what a rogue Barry Lyndon was, O'Neal was perfect for the role. Terrific movie, though not my favorite Thackeray novel.
While O'Neil is just a mediocre actor, Kubrick made him truly shine in BL.That shaell remain one of the great examples of unexpected casting. I simply loved every moment Ryan was on the screen - he fit so darn perfectly in the overall picture. The masterpiece became only better due to his presence.
I believe part of EWS downfall was in Kubrick's desire to repeat that successful trick. Take a shit actor, and build such a structure around him that he positively shocks everyone.
Perhaps Tom was not the right person for that trick, but it failed there miserably.
Perhaps O'Neal's succeeded simply because he didn't think of himself as of a super-star, and let the director use him as a master would use his brush.
Edits: 01/17/19
I sometimes go to a joint called the american cinematheque , they were in a week long run of Kubrick films. I saw barry lydon and felt the same way about the lead, and the movie, meh. I was hoping for better, considering the venue.
I was kind of regretting missing eyes wide shut. I was curious because it was being shown on a week end , usually reserved for good movies, and was supposed to be a big deal when it was released. I had no interest in the story when it came out, so was willing to give it a chance, plus I heard there was female nudity, if I am honest. I think it conflicted with a football game I wanted to see, so didn't go.
Your opinion about eyes wide shut pretty much confirmed my opinion formed without seeing the film , but i was willing to change my mind about it and check it out. No regrets now.
They did have kubrecks right hand man in for a short talk and questions about the films. On the night i went, he didn't say much beyond how great kubeck was. He did say the stories about barry Lydon being shot only with candlelight were untrue. he said they did do that , but only when they could.
TERRIBLE!
Regarding Kubrick, and especially BL, the linked documentary is worth watching
for many reasons. It's quite informative and entertaining.
"Once this was all Black Plasma and Imagination" -Michael McClure
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: