 
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
|
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: Any diff. between Composite, and S-Video? ? ? posted by Hantra on June 03, 2001 at 00:31:05:
I was just looking at that yesterday with my installation of a DBS Dish that has S-Vid out and cable out. Was comparing them on my Sony 32" XBR and older Yamaha RX-V992 and when you toggle back and forth on the 2 different inputs, the S-Video definetly removes blurring from around image boundaries and is generally great at tidying things up. I'm staying with the S-Video, the picture quality is first class when compared to composite and the Sony's digital comb filter is no slouch either.
Follow Ups:
One has to keep in mind, that the souce must be s/vhs, or interfaced to s/vhs from a higher quality standard like component. Sources from, DBS are component, converted to s/vhs with outs provided, DVD & S/vhs video tape recordings played on an s/vhs machine. Mini DV outs, High8 outs. Off air broadcasts of local channels are composite and will not reveal a better picture. Digital cable will provide s/vhs outs of their converter boxes, but standard cable won't give better results. Any recording on s/vhs machines, with s/vhs tape will give better results than standard vhs. Keeping a system in s/vhs from reception, to recording, to viewing will the best it can be, next to full component.
--db
S/video, component etc., is ready for the FAQ.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
