Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - The fiasco of " War of the Worlds "----------------- - patrickU 09:41:55 06/30/05 (80)

• Re: The fiasco of " War of the Worlds "----------------- - TomD 20:04:53 07/01/05 (0)
• Re: The fiasco of " War of the Worlds "----------------- - cjfrbw 13:48:57 07/01/05 (0)
• Well, as you said, you are tired of the entire genre of movie coming out of Hollywood, which I can respect. - Lord Dot 09:26:04 07/01/05 (14)
• Re: Did I? - patrickU 10:02:34 07/01/05 (9)
• Yes, but that is a very general complaint. What about THIS movie. - Lord Dot 10:06:43 07/01/05 (8)
• Re: Yes, but that is a very general complaint. What about THIS movie. - patrickU 10:41:28 07/01/05 (7)
• Ah well, too bad. There were lots of things I liked about it. - Lord Dot 11:02:46 07/01/05 (6)
• Re: Ah well, too bad. There were lots of things I liked about it. - patrickU 11:10:51 07/01/05 (5)
• Martians invade because their planet is all dried up. - Lord Dot 11:21:42 07/01/05 (4)
• Re: Martians invade because their planet is all dried up. - Analog Scott 11:45:32 07/02/05 (0)
• Re: Martians invade because their planet is all dried up. - patrickU 12:03:20 07/01/05 (2)
• Filling in the blanks ... - Lord Dot 12:14:56 07/01/05 (1)
• Re: Filling in the blanks ... - patrickU 01:17:05 07/02/05 (0)
• I also suspect that you are no "particular" fan of Science Fiction ... - Lord Dot 09:31:21 07/01/05 (3)
• Re: I also suspect that you are no "particular" fan of Science Fiction ... - patrickU 10:07:13 07/01/05 (2)
• OK. so no Science Fiction and no Horror. That's no fun! - Lord Dot 10:13:08 07/01/05 (1)
• Re: OK. so no Science Fiction and no Horror. That's no fun! - patrickU 10:56:43 07/01/05 (0)
• Same old same old, I agree ... but - halfnote 20:43:10 06/30/05 (6)
• Re: Same old same old, I agree ... but - patrickU 00:24:39 07/01/05 (5)
• Re: What's Speilberg's best, then? - halfnote 17:15:51 07/01/05 (4)
• Re: What's Speilberg's best, then? - rico 07:23:55 07/02/05 (0)
• 'Empire of the Sun'....IMHO....NT - Rich Jura 05:40:36 07/02/05 (0)
• Re: What's Speilberg's best, then? - patrickU 01:25:45 07/02/05 (0)
• Re: What's Speilberg's best, then? - patrickU 01:23:05 07/02/05 (0)
• Re: The fiasco of " War of the Worlds "----------------- - Analog Scott 20:34:42 06/30/05 (3)
• Re: The fiasco of " War of the Worlds "----------------- - patrickU 01:45:56 07/01/05 (2)
• Re: The fiasco of " War of the Worlds "----------------- - Analog Scott 08:49:12 07/01/05 (1)
• Re: The fiasco of " War of the Worlds "----------------- - patrickU 01:31:05 07/02/05 (0)
• The scene in the river with the tripods picking people out of the water was stunning. nt - Lord Dot 10:57:39 06/30/05 (40)
• Re: The scene in the river with the tripods picking people out of the water was stunning. nt - patrickU 11:13:49 06/30/05 (39)
• Re: The scene in the river with the tripods picking people out of the water was stunning. nt - Analog Scott 20:45:57 06/30/05 (30)
• Re: The scene in the river with the tripods picking people out of the water was stunning. nt - patrickU 01:49:45 07/01/05 (1)
• Re: The scene in the river with the tripods picking people out of the water was stunning. nt - Analog Scott 08:57:35 07/01/05 (0)
• What the hell is wrong with you? nt - Lord Dot 20:53:49 06/30/05 (27)
• Is relevant information offensive to you? nt. - Analog Scott 22:06:03 06/30/05 (26)
• Re: Lord is ( was ) somehow agressive....nt - patrickU 01:50:31 07/01/05 (0)
• No. nt. - Lord Dot 22:51:14 06/30/05 (24)
• Re: Then what the hell is your problem? nt. - Analog Scott 09:09:43 07/01/05 (23)
• No significant details in your comments. Just vitriol. - Lord Dot 09:16:59 07/01/05 (22)
• Balony. Learn to read. nt - Analog Scott 09:43:17 07/01/05 (21)
• Learn to read what? Your post? Just looks like you are pretending to know something about CGI. - Lord Dot 09:52:12 07/01/05 (20)
• Re: Hey baby, do you have your period? nt - patrickU 11:21:58 07/01/05 (2)
• Yea, I might be on the rag ... sorry. nt - Lord Dot 11:28:25 07/01/05 (1)
• Re: It is ok....nt - patrickU 12:04:34 07/01/05 (0)
• Like I said, learn to read. - Analog Scott 10:07:36 07/01/05 (16)
• And by the way, your last comment again had NO content. nt - Lord Dot 10:17:04 07/01/05 (4)
• Still haven't learned to read I see. nt - Analog Scott 11:30:59 07/01/05 (3)
• That's one sneaky post that is popping in and out, Hard to rad ... I mean read. nt - Lord Dot 11:32:44 07/01/05 (2)
• Ooh you caught me correcting a typo. You *must* be a deep thinker. I'm impressed. nt - Analog Scott 11:44:39 07/01/05 (1)
• Deep ... shallow ... depends ... I can be moody. nt - Lord Dot 11:47:42 07/01/05 (0)
• I have been brought in as a consultant on a few occassions by CGI guys to critique their work. - Lord Dot 10:15:02 07/01/05 (10)
• Re: I have been brought in as a consultant on a few occassions by CGI guys to critique their work. - Analog Scott 11:33:25 07/01/05 (9)
• By the way, I'm currently having a robotics technology animation done for my project at work, ... - Lord Dot 11:45:40 07/01/05 (3)
• Re: By the way, I'm currently having a robotics technology animation done for my project at work, ... - Analog Scott 12:18:16 07/01/05 (2)
• We probably just got off on the wrong foot ... lets try again ... - Lord Dot 12:52:40 07/01/05 (1)
• Re: ... lets try again ... fair enough. - Analog Scott 09:38:40 07/02/05 (0)
• Well, first, I don't "call out" people. You could be God almighty for all I care, I'd still ask for substance. nt - Lord Dot 11:37:28 07/01/05 (4)
• yeah right, explain this crap. " looks like you are pretending to know something about CGI." - Analog Scott 11:52:01 07/01/05 (3)
• Well do you know anything about CGI? If so ... what? nt - Lord Dot 11:56:52 07/01/05 (2)
• Well do you know anything about life? If so ... what? get back to me when you have an inteligent question. nt - Analog Scott 12:12:10 07/01/05 (1)
• heh heh ... ok. .nt - Lord Dot 12:16:33 07/01/05 (0)
• "Before the film started we had the preview that AuD posted and it was even more coarse that what I saw on the PC." - Audiophilander 12:31:45 06/30/05 (7)
• Re: " You are determined to hate Jackson "..... - patrickU 13:08:28 06/30/05 (6)
• No offense, ... - Audiophilander 15:29:26 06/30/05 (5)
• Re: No offense, ... - patrickU 01:52:03 07/01/05 (4)
• I'm very secure. How about you & the russian bare? (nt) - Audiophilander 09:11:18 07/01/05 (0)
• How else should he feel? - Victor Khomenko 06:53:24 07/01/05 (2)
• The only "little kids" around this site (intellectually speaking) are you two, ... - Audiophilander 09:26:35 07/01/05 (0)
• Re: How else should he feel? - patrickU 07:08:21 07/01/05 (0)
• Spielberg and screaming females - rditmars 09:52:44 06/30/05 (1)
• Re: Spielberg and screaming females - patrickU 09:55:03 06/30/05 (0)
• Hi Patrick ... here were my impressions ... also posted Outside... - Lord Dot 09:47:51 06/30/05 (8)
• Re: Hi Patrick ... here were my impressions ... also posted Outside... - patrickU 09:58:48 06/30/05 (7)
• I was feeling kind today ... I'm not sure why. I might be coming down with something. nt - Lord Dot 10:46:08 06/30/05 (6)
• Re: Where is Victor? nt - patrickU 11:20:52 06/30/05 (5)
• You don't expect me to watch Tom... do you? - Victor Khomenko 14:26:29 06/30/05 (4)
• Re: Actually after your " LoTR " coup.... - patrickU 01:53:47 07/01/05 (2)
• Sounds like a fair exchange then - Victor Khomenko 06:51:44 07/01/05 (1)
• Re: Sounds like a fair exchange then - patrickU 06:59:18 07/01/05 (0)
• Not fair. nt - Lord Dot 22:55:20 06/30/05 (0)

Follow Ups

• Re: Then what the hell is your problem? nt. - Analog Scott 09:09:43 07/01/05 (23)
• No significant details in your comments. Just vitriol. - Lord Dot 09:16:59 07/01/05 (22)
• Balony. Learn to read. nt - Analog Scott 09:43:17 07/01/05 (21)
• Learn to read what? Your post? Just looks like you are pretending to know something about CGI. - Lord Dot 09:52:12 07/01/05 (20)
• Re: Hey baby, do you have your period? nt - patrickU 11:21:58 07/01/05 (2)
• Yea, I might be on the rag ... sorry. nt - Lord Dot 11:28:25 07/01/05 (1)
• Re: It is ok....nt - patrickU 12:04:34 07/01/05 (0)
• Like I said, learn to read. - Analog Scott 10:07:36 07/01/05 (16)
• And by the way, your last comment again had NO content. nt - Lord Dot 10:17:04 07/01/05 (4)
• Still haven't learned to read I see. nt - Analog Scott 11:30:59 07/01/05 (3)
• That's one sneaky post that is popping in and out, Hard to rad ... I mean read. nt - Lord Dot 11:32:44 07/01/05 (2)
• Ooh you caught me correcting a typo. You *must* be a deep thinker. I'm impressed. nt - Analog Scott 11:44:39 07/01/05 (1)
• Deep ... shallow ... depends ... I can be moody. nt - Lord Dot 11:47:42 07/01/05 (0)
• I have been brought in as a consultant on a few occassions by CGI guys to critique their work. - Lord Dot 10:15:02 07/01/05 (10)
• Re: I have been brought in as a consultant on a few occassions by CGI guys to critique their work. - Analog Scott 11:33:25 07/01/05 (9)
• By the way, I'm currently having a robotics technology animation done for my project at work, ... - Lord Dot 11:45:40 07/01/05 (3)
• Re: By the way, I'm currently having a robotics technology animation done for my project at work, ... - Analog Scott 12:18:16 07/01/05 (2)
• We probably just got off on the wrong foot ... lets try again ... - Lord Dot 12:52:40 07/01/05 (1)
• Re: ... lets try again ... fair enough. - Analog Scott 09:38:40 07/02/05 (0)
• Well, first, I don't "call out" people. You could be God almighty for all I care, I'd still ask for substance. nt - Lord Dot 11:37:28 07/01/05 (4)
• yeah right, explain this crap. " looks like you are pretending to know something about CGI." - Analog Scott 11:52:01 07/01/05 (3)
• Well do you know anything about CGI? If so ... what? nt - Lord Dot 11:56:52 07/01/05 (2)
• Well do you know anything about life? If so ... what? get back to me when you have an inteligent question. nt - Analog Scott 12:12:10 07/01/05 (1)
• heh heh ... ok. .nt - Lord Dot 12:16:33 07/01/05 (0)