Why "Dirty Harry" films ARE a guilty pleasure.
Posted by tinear (A) on September 11, 2006 at 07:38:41
Harry doesn't believe in criminals' rights: Miranda, shmiranda: That's a dangerous attitude for a man that carries a gun with all the freedoms police officers enjoy. He doesn't seem to understand the responsibilities.
Harry has no problem in being judge, jury, and executioner: he'd fit in very well on the Rio de Janeiro police force where Death Squads freely exist.
Harry's female partner (the second film?) is portrayed as a stereotypical bumbler: no woman would make it to detective OR officer with that lack of basic police professionalism.
Most of the criminals are stereotypical long-hairs or else minority members. White clean cut perpetrators? They're Mafia...
Few if any violent criminals in these films are short-haired or white, excepting the clean-cut rogue cops in one film.
Great entertainment but ridiculously biased, hence "guilty."
This post is made possible by the generous
support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic -
Why "Dirty Harry" films ARE a guilty pleasure. - tinear 07:38:41 09/11/06
(4)
You can not post to an archived thread.