In Reply to: can anyone replace Gene Siscal? posted by petew on May 6, 1999 at 15:03:24:
" "Star Wars" is not a great movie in the sense that it describes the human condition. It simply is a fun picture that will appeal to those who enjoy Buck Rogers-style adventures. What places it a sizable cut above the routine is it's spectacular visual effects...On the debit side are the films human performances. Save for Alec Guinness, the cast is unmemorable. Lucas apparently blew his entire $9.5 million budget on visuals."
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - can anyone replace Gene Siscal? - petew 15:03:24 05/06/99 (5)Follow Ups
- Gene Siskel's original (1977) SW review - T. Buns 18:05:31 05/09/99 (0)
You can not post to an archived thread.