(SPOILER) Tarkovsky's "The Sacrifice." Andrei certainly is
Posted by tinear (A) on September 28, 2006 at 04:43:49
no Chekhov or Dostoevsky, though from the amount of dialogue one could imply he fancies himself one. Having a character, a few minutes into the film, begin to invoke Nietzche as if the even-well-educated are intimately familiar with his oevre is almost unforgivable snobbism, especially since it seems this reference plays a major part in the film's meaning.
Two key women are deemed so "weak" (indeed, one of them becomes unhinged in a way so melodramatic I found myself embarrassed for her) that they both need strong medicating while the men are just fine, thank you! Wow, that certainly dates the film.
The Sven Nykvist cinematography is wonderful and Tarkovsky's justly famous ability to match it to wonderful music is perfect but it isn't enough for a film to be well-crafted: it must have some sense to it, some purpose.
At the center of the film is the old man's relationship with his son: for all his protestations, the boy is never shown true afffection nor is he presented often enough for the audience to become even fond of him.
Even Tarkovsky's failures, of course, are interesting.
This post is made possible by the generous
support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic -
(SPOILER) Tarkovsky's "The Sacrifice." Andrei certainly is - tinear 04:43:49 09/28/06
(11)
You can not post to an archived thread.