Films/DVD Asylum Movies from comedy to drama to your favorite Hollyweird Star.

---

[ Follow Ups ] Thread: [ Display  All  Email ] [ Films/DVD Asylum ]

---

[ Alert Moderator ]

---

Re: Internet film documentary on 9/11

Posted by sjb (A) on December 24, 2006 at 08:34:49

In Reply to: Re: Internet film documentary on 9/11 posted by Awe-d-o-file on December 24, 2006 at 06:47:40:

Points one and two are good points but It also makes a whole lot of bad points. For instance they're shocked (SHOCKED!!!) that there was such a strong blast wave when the plane hit the Pentagon but just before expressing that shock they go on and on about how amazing it is that an 80 ton plane hit the building at 500+MPH and didn't leave any of the kind of debris that they're used to.

Well, it's not TOO hard to imagine that 80 tons of something hitting a building at 500+MPH would create quite a blast wave.

Then they show a plane that hit a hillside (meaning earth, that gives) and finding certain types of debris but they also go on about the plane hitting the most reinforced part of the building but never seem to make the connection that this could be a factor in the disintegration of the plane. They say stupid things too like why didn't these big spools of cable move? What?!?!? Those spools are scattered around! How do they we or anyone who wasn't there before know that they didn't get tossed around. Plus they were clearly charred.

Then they mention the employess of the local hotel watching the survellience footage "over and over in horror" before the FBI confiscated it. Well, assuming that desription is accurate it's not too hard to imagine "horror" being their reaction to seeing just recorded footage of a jet striking a building (that most symbolizes the military strength and power of our country) at full speed after barely making it over the highway and after two giant skyscrapers in NYC were similarly attacked.

Also, in regards to "only three steel frame skyscrapers have fallen from fire in the worlds history: Buiding 1,2,7 at the WTC." Funny how they don't mention that two of them are the only ones to be HIT AT FULL SPEED WITH PASSENGER JETS LOADED WITH FUEL and that the third had quite a bit of debris rained down upon it. If you watch the footage of the collapsing towers closely it's plain as day that huge chunks fall sideways and that huge jagged pieces of building were left in place until they fell later. That's NOT what happens when a building is brought down via demolition. Even in the footage early in this "Documentary" you can see the sideways falling and the huge pieces of building initially left standing.

As for building 7. Yup, it sure looks similar to controlled demolitions but that building was also a local CIA headquarters and who knows what else. Is it within the realm of possibility that such places buildings are prewired for demoliton lest they fall into the wrong hands? I know that's a leap but who knows???

All that said I certainly have my doubts about the official story (my doubts go more to the first couple of points and the feeling that we were kind of in stand down mode that day)but for this piece to be taken seriously the makers would have to do more than just fancy up their points while glossing over huge inconsistencies both factual and in their presentation.

Don't piss on my shoe and tell me it's raining.

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

VH Audio

---

[ Top of Page ] [ Contact Us ] [ Support/Wish List ] [ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]

---

[ General ] [ Speakers ] [ Tubes ] [ Vinyl ] [ Digital ] [ Hi-Rez ] [ Video Asylum ] [ Cables ] [ Tweaks/DIY ] [ Music ] [ Films ]

---