In Reply to: RE: Big thank you to Mr.Kohmenko! posted by Victor Khomenko on August 9, 2011 at 13:12:57:
"Regarding the mongoloid facial features, the tradition notion is that the invading hordes spent a lot of time raping local women."
I don't agree with it. Mongol armies were throughly professional, they would not have been allowed to loot and rape as they please for the reason it would have made them militarily ineffective.
Certainly Mongol armies during Chinese, Tibetian, and Korean campaign were not allowed to loot and rape. They did commit massacres as organized parties.
"They did not have garrisons, but the visits were regular and frequent."
It was regular, but I don't think it was frequent, raising an army for campaign was never cheap, besides it would have made their defense of their main compound less secure.
"Not just women have it, of course... just look at Lenin. Clear case of mongoloid feature coupled with advanced syphilis."
I don't try to notice it from men, why would I? Lenin doesn't stand a chance compared to some of the Russian ladies I've seen.
"Fomenko's theories might be hard to swallow, but I have not seen any plausible explanation as far as why suddenly such a gap in culture and history. It is easy just to call that time Dark Ages, but lack of explanation is bound to breed theories."
Please take a good look at the wall reliefs depicting Roman emperor Diocletian and the sculputres depciting Pompey for example.
Diocletian was supposed to be several centuries later than Pompey, yet Pompey's sculputre looks a lot more modern and 'renaissence'.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Big thank you to Mr.Kohmenko! - RedGrant 13:28:33 08/09/11 (2)
- RE: Big thank you to Mr.Kohmenko! - Victor Khomenko 14:05:43 08/09/11 (1)
- ...but I don't need to develop my own theory........... - RedGrant 14:35:44 08/09/11 (0)