Home Video Asylum

TVs, VCRs, DVD players, Home Theater systems and more.

Thanks, but...

Wow, thanks for the info - it's always good to learn something new!!

Anyhow, you've addressed the issue of DAC precision, but how about sampling frequency? Is the performance of 108 MHz DACs not generally much lower than that of 54 MHz DACs?


> However if there is any video processing going on (brightness,
> contrast, gamma, et cetera), then additional resolution is required
> in the DACs to avoid a loss of resolution in the final output
> signal. In this case, a 14-bit DAC would be required to achieve the
> resolution of a 12-bit DAC in a system without video processing.
> That is one reason why we don't offer any such adjustments in the
> Ayre D-1. Higher performance can be achieved by making these
> adjustments in the analog domain in the monitor itself.

I don't quite believe that, however. If all the processing is done after resampling (108 MHz is 4x oversampling), and carries full intermediate precision, until it's dithered down to the precision of the DAC, I think a good 12-bit 108 MHz DAC would be hard for analog processing to beat. Certainly the analog performance would be much less stable, over time, and with varying environmental conditions.


BTW, couldn't you test each unit, off the line, and program it to digitally compensate for much of its integral (and even some differential) nonlinearity?


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Signature Sound   [ Signature Sound Lounge ]


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups


You can not post to an archived thread.