Video Asylum

I don't buy for theoretical capacity, I buy movies I want to watch in high definition.

66.140.47.193

This Post Has Been Edited by the Author

In Reply to: RE: " ...you wanted the cheap player, casablanca and matrix..." - 1 partial fact out of 3 assertions... posted by Jazz Inmate on December 11, 2007 at 01:13:26

Tsk, tsk, next time you sell your soul to SONY for the opportunity to be a champion 'blues' man make sure someone better qualified hasn't beat you to the crossroads! ;0)
>>> "...doesn't change my point one bit." <<<
So, your point is still flaccid! That little 'Blu' pill you've swallowed, adopted and keep promoting should provide better results; maybe THAT explains why the 'capacity' is so underutilized! ;O}
>>> "Even if there were 10 hd dvd exclusives you wanted, or 20, you should have looked at the broader issues before adopting." <<<
Obviously you're in this 'game' for some other reason than as a movie fan! So, it would appear that you have little of value to offer in a discussion of high definition movie appreciation unless it just happens to support your Blu-ray agenda.
>>> "BTW, I can't remember what HD DVDs you own because I don't care and it doesn't affect my point about your reasons for adopting and your ongoing stance that capacity isn't important." <<<
Sorry, but you apparently have no point other than acting as an unpaid SONY shill. Heck, even a prostitute deserves to get paid for performing services above and beyond the call of duty. ;^D
>>> "Ah well...we all have our priorities." <<<
*Ahem* Yes siree, THAT we can clearly see. You really should hang up those pom-poms even if your clients have a thing for cheer-leaders; it's rather unseemly regardless of the width of your stance! :O)
Cheers (Rah! Rah! LOL!),
AuPh

Edits: 12/11/07

Follow Ups: