Video Asylum

HDMI vs. Optical; why did HDMI become the standard ?

68.166.202.33


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] Thread: [ Display  Email  Next ] [ Video Asylum ]

Optical technology (but not Toslink) seems tailor-made for high bandwidth digital audio/video distribution. In fact, I think most of the internet distribution backbone relies on Fiber optics. Why would the Consumer electronics industry settle on a copper distribution system with bulky, awkward connectors when an itty, bitty Optical cable would easily have served the purpose (Toslink was a specific implementation which didn't require any bandwidth) ?

A friend of mine (engineer) asked this question and I didn't have a good answer. Why are we settling for second-rate technology in our Consumer electronics products ? HDMI was supposed to simply connection issues, but fiber optics would seem to be simplify even more (I hate that flimsy, non-locking HDMI connection).



Follow Ups:


Post a Followup:

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?
Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
  Remember my Moniker & Password  (What's this?)    Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:
Message:   (Posts are subject to Content Rules)
Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:  Automagically notify you when someone responds.


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] Thread: [ Display  Email  Next ] [ Video Asylum ]
[ Comment ] [ Edit ] [ Delete ] [ Copyright Warning! Click for Details ]