![]() ![]() |
Films/DVD Asylum Movies from comedy to drama to your favorite Hollyweird Star. |
For Sale Ads |
Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.
Original Message
Sorry, but Spiderman I & II, while not perfect, were far better than III.
Posted by Audiophilander on May 22, 2007 at 09:54:50:
>>> "Equally there are enough weaknesses in this film that I would normally be happily be pulling it to pieces, but the film's positive elements meant that I could skate over them rather than dwelling on them." <<<
No offense, but I couldn't skate over the glaring faults as did you and Jon.
>>> "I thoroughly enjoyed it, two hours of mindless entertainment - well, what do you expect of a comic!" <<<
I've been a fan of the Spidey comics since the earliest days. There's mindless and then there's brain-dead; the third film has FAR too many precious coincidences to be entertaining for anyone who cares about logic in a film or even a broadly drawn comic book. Sadly, the problems with Raimi's third effort boils down to sloppy screen writing and complacent direction.
I realize that you don't especially care for the social relevance stuff ("insight into the human condition"), but it's what contributed to the first two films success at suspending disbelief and I would assume the resultant popularity of those films. Note: Suspension of disbelief is essential to the appreciation of character driven cinema, and the Spiderman series is unequivocally character-driven even if not "high art" cinema.
Cheers,
AuPh