Films/DVD Asylum

Movies from comedy to drama to your favorite Hollyweird Star.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

Oh really, historically challenged one...

Posted by jamesgarvin on August 24, 2007 at 13:20:05:
"I am having a spat with jamesgarvin that I didn't intend and I'm trying to find a way out. I've offered truce but he refused. And he said he will not leave me alone. So, we'll battle until a pleasing conclusion is reached."

Me and the Tinman have a little repartee' under my posting Quinceanera, in which you responded with the following comment: "I think most of what you say is regurgitation, or as you put it, "many others made the claim before me". Be sure to also alert us when you say something of your own creation. ;~)I think I probably have time now for a good long nap.""

Now, you were not involved in that conversation, I did not address you, refer to you, or involve you in any way. Yet you felt compelled to jump with the smarmy comment. What was it that you did not intend with that comment?

Now, what do you write to Clarke: "In this case you have taken a side and just snipe from a distance." Hmm. Sound familiar.

Under the "Breach" topic, in response to your query "which conclusion" which I provided you, your ressponse? "You'd appear a whole lot smarter if you'd address the original question with some original thought", and then the shenanigans begin. And you did not intend, what?

In this case you have taken a side and just snipe from a distance.