Films/DVD Asylum

Movies from comedy to drama to your favorite Hollyweird Star.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

Brings to mind "Waterworld"...

Posted by mpathus on November 20, 2007 at 21:02:42:
...When I saw its theatrical release, it came in around the ~2 or so hour range, and although I appreciated Cosner's vision, I didn't enjoy the film until missing footage was included years later.

Happens to other films as well -- an seemingly unfinished rush to release, then proper tidying up later after some time to mull has passed.

Time viewing a film seems to pass quickly when a long story is well told, rather than a shorter rush to print that leaves an audience confused.

Perhaps that is why I generally seek out the "director's, or "restored" cut when available -- the whole shebang so to speak.