Films/DVD Asylum

Movies from comedy to drama to your favorite Hollyweird Star.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

A varied group.

Posted by Harmonia on September 11, 2008 at 13:52:22:
I sometimes look to diferent critics for different types of films.
I nearly always check out Stephanie Zacharek at salon.com (and Andrew O'Hehir at same spot for indies and foreign). Steph and I are frequently on the same wavelength, and her reviews are lengthy and in depth. Even if I ultimately disagree, I understand her POV and can adjust from there.
Kenneth Turran at LA Times - there's another (female) critic on this daily (whose name escapes me) who's done some nice work too.
Ty Burr - Boston Globe
Michael Wilmington - used to be at the Chicago Trib but is elswhere now.
David Kehr when I can find him.
MaryAnn Johansen at FlickFilosopher.com is great for all things geek.
I like to read Dan Jardine's thoughts on film, current or classic.
Will also look at David Denby at New Yorker. And sometimes the folks at the NY Times. David Eddelstein occassionally.
Peter Travers was once actually a good critic, not that you could tell nowdays. When RS actually gave him space and motivation, he had some cogent things to say about contemporary cinema. That was over ten years ago. Travers is smart enough to know better but he's now marginal interst at best.
Ebert is an excellent writer, but he's way too forgiving of commercial pablum. But he can be quite good on individual films and classics. He is absolutely sincere in his passion for movies.
If I'm going to see a movie no matter what, I try not to read any reviews. I hate spoilers and prefer to watch new films with a "clean" eye.
There are more good film writers about, but I don't put much stock in the mass media outlets like EW, USA Today et al. People like Rex Reed and Leonard Maltin is completely off my radar. I NEVER watch "happy face" local or national movie moments on Today or suchlike. Too "consumer guide" for me.
I loathe the concept of giving a film a letter grade, just hate it completely. I'd often rather see and interesting failure than a mediocre success. So I avoid sites with this kind of structure.