Films/DVD Asylum

Movies from comedy to drama to your favorite Hollyweird Star.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

I hear you

Posted by Jazz Inmate on September 26, 2008 at 22:50:14:
But frankly I think the DVD and VHS versions looked defective and this Blu-ray was produced right. Compare it to other films, and you'll see what I mean. With all due respect to the High Def Digest reviewer, I don't think the contrast is pumped up on the BD; I think it was dynamicaly squashed/compressed on previous GF home video releases. But given that we don't have the source material, it's hard to say. What impresses me so much and leads me to believe Harris' approach is proper is the level of detail, definition and resolution that made the BD version appear more lifelike, vibrant and true. Signs of inappropriate processing always get in the way of those characteristics, but I believe Harris' approach was 100% appropriate.