Films/DVD Asylum

Movies from comedy to drama to your favorite Hollyweird Star.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

I hesitate to admit now, after all the response, that the

Posted by tinear on December 23, 2008 at 19:21:34:
last line of my original post was "tongue-in-cheek."
I can understand watching Helen Mirren as a detective or Alec Guiness as a spy. But, with limited time available and a choice between second rate actors starring in tv series with second-rate writers and directors or classic films? When one factors in the visual aesthetic of film over tv, as well, it isn't a tough decision.
Nothing "wrong" in and of itself now, except.... why watch good when great is just as easy?