Register / Login
Home
AudioAsylum Trader
Films/DVD Asylum

Movies from comedy to drama to your favorite Hollyweird Star.

For Sale Ads

FAQ / News / Events

 

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.

You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login


Login to access features only available to registered Asylum Inmates.
    By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username:

The Name that you picked or by default, your email.
Forgot Moniker?

 
 

Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".

Password:    

Forgot Password?

 Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:  
Your Email:  
Subject:  

Message Comments

   

Original Message

Interesting that no one has mentioned Altered States.

Posted by Harmonia on January 11, 2009 at 16:07:18:

I saw it not long ago and it's worn much better than it might have IMO.

This was William Hurt's film debut, and he takes the role and runs with it. I know this controversial film will be over the top for some inmates, especially those who are allergic to Ken Russell, but for me it's no more excessive than something like Aliens, and frankly, I find it a heckuva lot braver, more searching and entertaining.

Whatever else you could say about it, Altered States is thoughtful, it does ask the "big questions", and makes universal one man's lonley, tortured personal quest. The material was a good match for Russell, who was relatively restrained, except of course fro a few erm...famous sequences. The bravura served his story well in this case. (If only Russell had reined in Blair Brown's performance a bit.) The scientist John Lilly, on whose life and work the novel and film were based, liked the final product. So do I.

It was quite startling for its time - made 1979, released 1980. Won a bunch of awards. Not much discussed nowdays, which is a shame. Victim of the declining interest in hallucinogenics or backlash against Russell?