Films/DVD Asylum

Movies from comedy to drama to your favorite Hollyweird Star.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

This film also seems to be highly revisionist: the "heroes" may have been mass murderers,

Posted by tinear on January 17, 2009 at 17:42:57:
themselves.
(wikipedia)
"The largest controversy centers around the Naliboki massacre in May 1943, when Polish peasants and members of the Polish resistance were killed by Soviet partisans. (For more on the relations between Polish and Soviet resistance, see Soviet partisans in Poland). While historians have yet to finish their research on that subject, some sources contend that the Bielski partisans participated in the Naliboki massacre with the Soviet partisans.[8] Other sources argue that so far little evidence has been found to suggest the Bielski partisans were responsible for the massacre, and some historians, including Tuvia Bielskiâ€™s son, claim that the Bielski partisans were not in the area at the time.[9] No mention of this event is present in the film, which has been criticized for this omission, particularly in Poland, and also for glorifying people who may have been responsible for the massacre.[8]
While the issue of the Naliboki massacre remains the most controversial, the Polish press and historians have criticized the movie for other historical inaccuracies. The mainstream Polish journal Gazeta Wyborcza (editor Adam Michnik is of Jewish descent) noted in a series of articles that Zwick inaccurately portrayed the Bielski partisans as actively fighting the German army. Citing research by Polish historians and the Institute of National Remembrance, the critics point out that the Bielski partisans followed a "survivalist" strategy: their goal was to stay alive, not to strike at the Germans. Thus they fled German manhunts and avoided direct confrontations as much as possible.[10]
Further, the background of the movie is criticized. The movie portrays the Navahrudak (NowogrÃ³dek) and surrounding areas (pre-war NowogrÃ³dek Voivodeship of the Second Polish Republic) as entirely Jewish and Belarusian, while, according to Gazeta Wyborcza, there was a significant Polish minority in those areas. (According to official Polish pre-war census data, Navahrudak was approximately 50% Jews, 25% Poles, 20% Belarusians, and 5% others.) Critics also complain that the movie ignores the significant presence in the region of the Polish resistance, not just the Soviet-allied groups. There have also been complaints that the movie portrays the Bielski partisans as fluent in Russian (or Belarusian), but not Polish, when in fact, according to Gazeta Wyborcza, they were more fluent in Polish, and might have not known Russian at all. However, since the film is mostly in English, it is possible that this is being used as a simplification to represent Polish and Russian, thus making this point moot. Gazeta Wyborcza proposes that the movie's main problem is not the in-progress investigation of the (possibly false) Naliboki connection, but the gross historical inaccuracy of ignoring the dominant Polish element in the background.[11]
The Jewish Press cited the American prosecutor at the Nuremberg Trials, Telford Taylor, as saying that, with regard to movies generally, "historical misrepresentations could leave the uninformed viewer with an inaccurate historical record about what a movie is depicting" while criticizing the fictionalization of the story.[12]"