Home
AudioAsylum Trader
Films/DVD Asylum

Movies from comedy to drama to your favorite Hollyweird Star.

For Sale Ads

FAQ / News / Events

 

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.

You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login


Login to access features only available to registered Asylum Inmates.
    By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username:

The Name that you picked or by default, your email.
Forgot Moniker?

 
 

Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".

Password:    

Forgot Password?

 Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:  
Your Email:  
Subject:  

Message Comments

   

Original Message

For perhaps an hour, "Revolutionary Road" appears headed

Posted by tinear on January 26, 2009 at 17:24:21:

to being the best film of the year.
And then..... SPOILER!.... it goes off the tracks by having the heroine involved in one of the current American social red-button issues with a resolution which is tidy and moral, in the worst Hollywood sense.
There is another gaping problem with the film, namely the shock that Winslet's character not only never has loved her husband but that, indeed, she thoroughly loathes and hates him. Now, there intrinsically is nothing wrong with this and it has been a dramatic staple of melodramas forl centuries. But Mendes, the director, sabotages his film by not showing either the great faults DiCaprio's character possesses to warrant this immense wifely rage or the reasons his wife keeps such explosiveness hidden for eight years (or so).
Leonardo is quite good but he has a penchant for scenery chewing: flailing around with his arms, caterwauling, and wildly gesturing and moving about to express his emotions. It almost seems he's pantomiming a silent film performance. That's too bad because, in the less emotional moments of the film he shows effortlessness, quieter intensity, and depth.
Winslet's performance is of good quality, as usual, but what can she do when the most important parts of her character are missing?
This is all a tragedy because the film seemed like it was going to be a good commentary or at least exploration on one of modern man's most important questions: are money and career really worth the sacrifices which one must make for success or should one pursue a more original, much more challenging and singular path?
Unfortunately, after careful presentation of this question, Mendes walks away from it.