|
Films/DVD Asylum Movies from comedy to drama to your favorite Hollyweird Star. |
For Sale Ads |
Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.
Original Message
#1: the FX in "Avatar" really aren't "natural" looking at all, the movement
Posted by tinear on January 8, 2010 at 07:58:51:
of the figures is deeply flawed. The animals in the film are ridiculous, on a par with many children's films like "Star Wars." What people are applauding is the 3-D improvement. How many raves about it when the viewer sees it in 2-D?
"2012" was a fun ride and the FX were believable, Woody was entertaining as hell, and Cusack was fine.
"Avatar" was like going to a cheap carnival and having the barker yell out political slogans.