Films/DVD Asylum

Movies from comedy to drama to your favorite Hollyweird Star.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

Sherlock Holmes-

Posted by patrickU on July 13, 2010 at 13:07:45:
I know my Conan Doyle perfectly well.
I grew up with.

Now what did Ritchie with it.
A bit of digital haze, but not too much.
A few inventive camera works.
More or less inventive since Cosner Robin Hood.
He got an excellent Charlie Chaplin actor. And the rest was perfectly enjoyable.
Shake and a modern sauce poured over the whole, et voila you got a modern film.

Now did he fit in the spirit of the novels. Yes it did.
What is lush? Yes it was.
Was it boring.
No it was not.

Nicely done I would say, Ritchie.
I hope you got another one in this range.
Good show.