Films/DVD Asylum

Movies from comedy to drama to your favorite Hollyweird Star.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

RE: Intestellar, not so stellar

Posted by geoffkait on September 7, 2015 at 10:34:16:
I did see it on the big screen. Well, a big huge theater screen, anyway. The science even if it was accurate which I highly doubt was trite and dull. That's my main gripe - that Kip Thorne, the science guru who acted as advisor for Interstellar, Was SO DULL. Besides, all the key features of Interstellar, including the science and the time travel, were already done in Contact, and much better. Even the special effects in Contact were superior and that was 20 years ago! Hel-loo! Hey, I like time travel movies as much as the next guy but good ones, ones like Contact, Back to the Future and the Time Machine. As for Gravity, at least it had some suspense and very good special effects. Unlike you know what. As far as the time travel science it was totally bogus. The aging of people on Earth compared to an astronaut traveling near the speed of light is a paradox. It all depends on which system is defined as the one at rest. Hel-looo! In other words it's strictly a literary device. It's not science.