Video Asylum

TVs, VCRs, DVD players, Home Theater systems and more.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

Wow is right

Posted by 4season on August 20, 2007 at 11:50:08:
You scooped me ;-)

I wonder what the real motivation was? I can think of a few possible reasons:

Blu-Ray too closely associated with competitor Sony/Sony Pictures/Columbia?

PS/3 demographics not all they hoped for? PS/3's dominance in the Blu-Ray world seems to skew movie selection towards what I'd call "guy movies", and "300" seemed like a perfect fit, but other types of movies? *shrug*

Higher royalties?