![]() ![]() |
Video Asylum TVs, VCRs, DVD players, Home Theater systems and more. |
For Sale Ads |
Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.
Original Message
that was funny
Posted by Joe Murphy Jr on August 31, 2007 at 20:02:14:
Yes, he probably heard a difference depending on the title. I haven't done any serious comparisons yet, but I did notice that 300's PCM and TrueHD tracks are really out of whack (I only watched the first few minutes of the movie the day I got it to see how it looked). I wouldn't put it past the morons at Warner Bros to have given the dialog normalization wheel a first rate spin and really crank up the crap factor.
It's really sad what Dolby has become re: audio quality. I used to respect the company for the audio tools they provided to consumers. From Dolby B, C and S noise reduction for tape decks to Dolby Surround and Pro-Logic Surround for home theaters to Dolby Surround and Spectral Recording for the cinema. They were truly a company you could count on to deliver a better audio experience for the end user.
Starting with AC-3/Dolby Digital, they began sucking donkey dicks. Given the time they've had to correct that mistake and have yet to do so, I believe they've moved on to elephants.