Video Asylum

TVs, VCRs, DVD players, Home Theater systems and more.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

We can agree to disagree.

Posted by oscar on November 30, 2007 at 05:19:19:
Most of the material where movies are available on both formats (i.e. Warner) also use the exact same encodes so you'd expect the picture quality to be the same. Yes, PQ on HD DVD can be very good (or very mediocre) and likewise with Blu-ray. But I find the 50G Fox/Sony/Disney releases consistently have better picture than Universal/Warner releases. This is not inconsistent with the finding of the wouldbe HD movie reviewers on various websites. YMMV.

Have you had the chance to play around with lossless/uncompressed audio yet ? This is the more obvious differentiator IMHO.