|
Video Asylum TVs, VCRs, DVD players, Home Theater systems and more. |
For Sale Ads |
Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.
Original Message
RE: Ok, lets evaluate your "point", but first let's look at Paramount's agenda
Posted by Jazz Inmate on December 5, 2007 at 11:59:01:
>> I didn't say it was scientific. <<
True, but you are constantly asking for "proof" from me while relying on specious evidence to support your own position.
>> You implied if studios used different codecs/transfers for the different formats, BD would look better. <<
Kind of, but what I said was that HD DVD content is more or less ported over to produce the BD content from studios dabbling in both formats. Or did you think Paramount was going back to the source material, breaking out the film and redigitizing it to produce separate content for both codecs. What makes you think they're different transfers?
>> I gave examples of that not being the case. <<
Not really. It's obviously sourced from the same transfer. You can't point to Paramount as a company that we can rely upon to see the advantages of Blu-ray. Not if you expect to be taken seriously, at any rate.
-------------"I have found that if you love life, life will love you back." -Arthur Rubinstein (1887-1982)