Video Asylum

TVs, VCRs, DVD players, Home Theater systems and more.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

RE: Maybe .....

Posted by unclestu52 on June 22, 2008 at 22:31:28:
Well, I'm speaking as an old man and remembering that Mits had a 480I 42 inch plasma for a mere $10K back in about 1990 with a relatively lousy picture. I can say that the initial flat screens did not have 1080 or even 768 resolution and the 480 sets were very expensive. Curiously these early sets did begin to move, and by the time the 768 sets came out even though prices for a 42 inch plasma were still in the $3K to $4K range they began to move and cosmetics had a lot to do with it. PQ had relatively little to do with it. Women wanted a smaller set with better furniture appeal visually.

That's been my experience.

Stu