Home
AudioAsylum Trader
Video Asylum

TVs, VCRs, DVD players, Home Theater systems and more.

For Sale Ads

FAQ / News / Events

 

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.

You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login


Login to access features only available to registered Asylum Inmates.
    By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username:

The Name that you picked or by default, your email.
Forgot Moniker?

 
 

Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".

Password:    

Forgot Password?

 Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:  
Your Email:  
Subject:  

Message Comments

   

Original Message

Samsung LN52A650 verses Sony KDL-46XBR2

Posted by TGT on April 6, 2009 at 15:56:04:

I have replaced my Sony KDL-46XBR2 (2006 model) with a Samsung LN52A650 (2008 model). Gave the Sony to my daughter.
Nothing wrong with the picture on the Sony. However, there are three areas of improvement. Blacks have a “inkier” darker character, and overall contrast is a bit better.
The third is one I didn’t expect. There is three-dimensional impression on some HD content that I never noticed on the Sony. Images seem to “pop” on good HD content and foreground images seem separated from the background.
I suspect the improvement may be due to its “ultra clear panel” that is shinier than the Sony’s dull screen. And therein is the price. The Samsung is less forgiving of reflections from light sources. This isn’t a problem since we have blinds on all windows. The improvement in the picture is well worth this annoyance.