Video Asylum

TVs, VCRs, DVD players, Home Theater systems and more.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

Brilliant analysis.........

Posted by RedGrant on June 8, 2011 at 00:41:14:
"The price/performance ratio is much better of a stereo system and if you want a high-end MCH system, it will raise the cost and complexity of the system. Only the cheap AV systems are a success but not the expensive high-end MCH systems."

No truer words have been said. Yes, quad was conceived as a gimmick to wring more bucks from 'audiophile' consumers.

I personally would prefer an excellent mono system over all others, for economic, musical, and archictectural reasons.