|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
77.111.245.10
In Reply to: RE: "it was Wendy who was batcrap crazy" posted by RGA on May 12, 2021 at 19:39:51
. . . was that it was bunk. She agreed with the poster who held that all the continuity errors of the (chair/rug/kool-aid, etc.) placements were not intended to be noticed by the viewer per se (even though a lot of fanatics DO notice them!), but rather to generate a vague sense of unease. IOW, you're not noticing the inconsistencies consciously, but rather producing within yourself a general unsettling discomfort from them.
Follow Ups:
That's her take - so what? I mean it's a valid take but so is the take in the video.There is aI would make the case that there is a consistency to these shifting patterns - the furniture is one certain way when she is in a psychotic episode and another way when not. In other words, the furniture is not "random." Random would indicate your wife's take. But because the furniture is consistent when in reality and consistent during a psychotic break then it holds to his Wendy Theory quite well.
Edits: 05/13/21
But to me, there are a number of elements in it that require special pleading, such as Jack's "facial expression" as he begins re-typing. That's not proof of anything. Or the paper being already in the typewriter - when I first saw that, I assumed that Kubrick didn't want to waste screen time showing Jack putting the paper back in. There are all sorts of alternative explanations for the Wendy Theory's "evidence".
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: