"Boldly go"? Even Rodenberry admitted that Star Trek was no more than "Wagon Train in Space" (nt) - Rob Doorack

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Farscape on DVD - late 15:43:13 11/25/01 (60)

dennis, are you out of your freaking (pardon the expression) mind? - petew 15:55:20 12/18/01 (0)

No Farscape fans??? Have you all gone mad? - late 06:52:46 11/27/01 (58)

Ex Farscape fan... - Joe S 11:06:14 11/28/01 (0)

Yes late, the wife and I are Farscape fans and have been since it started. - Audiophilander 21:49:46 11/27/01 (54)

Far out - late 07:49:41 12/07/01 (0)

Lost in Space was the best SF ever made for TV. - john dem 22:51:19 11/27/01 (51)

Re: Lost in Space was the best SF ever made for TV. - danj 00:54:56 01/03/02 (0)

Do any boomers remember the comic series from which Lost In Space derived????? - Harmonia 22:00:27 11/29/01 (0)

Re: Lost in Space was the best SF ever made for TV. - Rob Doorack 06:35:25 11/28/01 (48)

Sure, the original ST is badly dated, but LIS was sucko in it's own time, period. - Audiophilander 13:31:03 11/28/01 (29)

Harlan Ellison and Star Trek - Senator Blutarsky 12:08:18 12/11/01 (0)

Jonathan Harris could out- act ANY Star Trek actor, even today. - john dem 19:29:49 11/28/01 (27)

No offense John, but I do take my humor seriously. ;^) - Audiophilander 23:58:36 11/28/01 (26)

Holy Afficianado ! - john dem 04:27:34 11/29/01 (25)

nope - late 06:20:13 11/29/01 (24)

Re: nope - john dem 12:20:40 11/29/01 (23)

John, you have a right to an educated opinion ... - Audiophilander 21:26:22 11/29/01 (16)

Super Auph to the rescue ! - john dem 22:07:17 11/29/01 (15)

Up, up and away! - Audiophilander 06:58:32 11/30/01 (14)

Defying logic is not a super power, Super Auph. - john dem 11:24:18 11/30/01 (12)

The poster's logic lacks Vulcanization! ;^) - Audiophilander 01:31:05 12/01/01 (11)

You're the one burning rubber to get away from your absurd assertions. - john dem 13:56:17 12/01/01 (10)

To the contrary, my prophylactic response is quite logical: - Audiophilander 15:07:22 12/03/01 (0)

the remains of the day - late 18:49:17 12/01/01 (8)

Re: the remains of the day - Bruce from DC 06:40:19 12/03/01 (1)

good post, minor quibble(s) - late 07:27:57 12/07/01 (0)

Enter late, defender of the punyverse. - john dem 19:42:47 12/01/01 (5)

intuitively obvious to the casual observer - late 21:51:33 12/01/01 (4)

Yes, it is obvious. - john dem 23:09:50 12/01/01 (3)

naught, plus naught, equals... - late 07:35:17 12/02/01 (2)

Yawn...it must be late. - john dem 13:58:05 12/02/01 (1)

Don't like losing, do you? --nt-- - late 16:16:35 12/02/01 (0)

a tinker's damn - late 08:09:55 11/30/01 (0)

semi-curmudgeonly - Bruce from DC 16:13:57 11/29/01 (2)

ya done good - late 17:03:47 11/29/01 (0)

No curmudgeonly argument here. - john dem 16:44:20 11/29/01 (0)

the critic speaks - late 12:31:21 11/29/01 (2)

What "tech" in the 50's are you talking about ? - john dem 12:47:12 11/29/01 (1)

yes, and no - late 13:44:41 11/29/01 (0)

Re: Lost in Space was the best SF ever made for TV. - john dem 08:15:21 11/28/01 (1)

i have a cat named Miss Kitty --nt-- - late 08:18:09 11/28/01 (0)

to boldly go where no series went before.... - late 07:00:57 11/28/01 (15)

"Boldly go"? Even Rodenberry admitted that Star Trek was no more than "Wagon Train in Space" (nt) - Rob Doorack 07:33:00 11/28/01 (14)

obvious, and beside the point, first is first.... - late 07:57:11 11/28/01 (13)

First IS first - and Lost in Space was on the air a year before Star Trek - Rob Doorack 08:30:27 11/28/01 (12)

You are TECHNICALLY correct, buckaroo, but only technically. - Audiophilander 14:18:16 11/28/01 (8)

No, I'm right - period. - Rob Doorack 06:57:45 11/29/01 (7)

Pardon me, no offense, but you're partially incorrect! (exclamation point!) - Audiophilander 11:06:44 11/29/01 (0)

tsk,tsk,tsk - late 07:58:36 11/29/01 (5)

Re: tsk,tsk,tsk - Rob Doorack 09:05:37 11/29/01 (4)

Re: tsk,tsk,tsk - Bruce from DC 13:18:28 12/01/01 (2)

Re: tsk,tsk,tsk - Rob Doorack 13:30:03 12/03/01 (1)

Re:advancing senility takes its toll - Bruce from DC 16:32:15 12/03/01 (0)

a conclusion few would share - late 09:20:14 11/29/01 (0)

ok, my goof, but have you seen one lately? --nt-- - late 09:16:01 11/28/01 (2)

Yes, as recently as a couple of years ago - Rob Doorack 13:59:00 11/28/01 (1)

then perhaps we should agree to disagree --nt-- - late 14:02:33 11/28/01 (0)

Danger, Will Robinson, Danger!!! - late 22:36:11 11/27/01 (0)

Did you read the first sentence of your post? - Bruce from DC 13:29:24 11/27/01 (0)

Farscape Rocks! - Rich S. 07:05:26 11/27/01 (0)

Follow Ups

"Boldly go"? Even Rodenberry admitted that Star Trek was no more than "Wagon Train in Space" (nt) - Rob Doorack 07:33:00 11/28/01 (14)

obvious, and beside the point, first is first.... - late 07:57:11 11/28/01 (13)

First IS first - and Lost in Space was on the air a year before Star Trek - Rob Doorack 08:30:27 11/28/01 (12)

You are TECHNICALLY correct, buckaroo, but only technically. - Audiophilander 14:18:16 11/28/01 (8)

No, I'm right - period. - Rob Doorack 06:57:45 11/29/01 (7)

Pardon me, no offense, but you're partially incorrect! (exclamation point!) - Audiophilander 11:06:44 11/29/01 (0)

tsk,tsk,tsk - late 07:58:36 11/29/01 (5)

Re: tsk,tsk,tsk - Rob Doorack 09:05:37 11/29/01 (4)

Re: tsk,tsk,tsk - Bruce from DC 13:18:28 12/01/01 (2)

Re: tsk,tsk,tsk - Rob Doorack 13:30:03 12/03/01 (1)

Re:advancing senility takes its toll - Bruce from DC 16:32:15 12/03/01 (0)

a conclusion few would share - late 09:20:14 11/29/01 (0)

ok, my goof, but have you seen one lately? --nt-- - late 09:16:01 11/28/01 (2)

Yes, as recently as a couple of years ago - Rob Doorack 13:59:00 11/28/01 (1)

then perhaps we should agree to disagree --nt-- - late 14:02:33 11/28/01 (0)