According to IMDb the original aspect ratio of Phantom Menace was 2.35:1 (nt) - Thom P

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Why is 2.35:1 so overused on DVDs? - CarlEber 20:07:50 12/17/01 (82)

Re: Why is 2.35:1 so overused on DVDs? - Heatmiser 02:04:22 12/31/01 (6)

Re: Why is 2.35:1 so overused on DVDs? - CarlEber 03:04:22 12/31/01 (5)

Re: Why is 2.35:1 so overused on DVDs? - Heatmiser 11:26:06 12/31/01 (4)

it's all good.... - CarlEber 19:52:08 12/31/01 (0)

Re: Why is 2.35:1 so overused on DVDs? - Ermac 11:35:05 12/31/01 (2)

Re: Why is 2.35:1 so overused on DVDs? - CarlEber 19:54:34 12/31/01 (0)

Re: Why is 2.35:1 so overused on DVDs? - PETER 11:55:29 12/31/01 (0)

Re: Why is 2.35:1 so overused on DVDs? - George_L 11:43:30 12/21/01 (1)

<sigh> (nt) - CarlEber 02:01:45 12/23/01 (0)

Re: Why is 2.35:1 so overused on DVDs? - Joe S 07:00:51 12/20/01 (29)

Re: Why is 2.35:1 so overused on DVDs? - CarlEber 21:11:40 12/20/01 (28)

Re: Why is 2.35:1 so overused on DVDs? - Joe S 11:29:27 12/21/01 (23)

Re: Why is 2.35:1 so overused on DVDs? - CarlEber 02:39:17 12/23/01 (22)

Re: Why is 2.35:1 so overused on DVDs? - Joe S 10:31:57 12/23/01 (21)

wah wah wah..... - CarlEber 21:08:10 12/24/01 (20)

wah? wah? wah? - Joe S 11:29:32 12/25/01 (19)

Uh huh... - CarlEber 03:28:49 12/27/01 (18)

Rest assured Carl... - Joe S 13:35:30 12/27/01 (15)

Re: Rest assured Joe... - CarlEber 19:04:19 12/30/01 (14)

Puking in Tennessee... - Joe S 09:02:14 12/31/01 (13)

Oh my, you're turning green Joe... - CarlEber 19:44:10 12/31/01 (12)

Carl, what is a "reflecting/wildlife lake" ? (nt) - Iguana Man 11:49:08 01/02/02 (5)

A place where iguana's achieve... - CarlEber 20:11:01 01/02/02 (2)

Actually, for male iguanas, simultaneous "o's" are easy... - Iguana Man 04:22:49 01/03/02 (1)

More than I needed to know...and try the dictionary (nt) - CarlEber 19:36:00 01/03/02 (0)

I think it's a... - Joe S 13:29:03 01/02/02 (1)

Joe's got pigs on the brain - CarlEber 20:15:15 01/02/02 (0)

Gosh! I'm impressed Carl. - Joe S 12:05:24 01/01/02 (3)

Re: Gosh! I'm impressed Carl. - CarlEber 04:26:07 01/02/02 (2)

Carl..... - Joe S 13:26:01 01/02/02 (1)

Re: "S"..... - CarlEber 20:17:42 01/02/02 (0)

Re: Hey! It's f#ckwit Carl! - Jim Willis 07:52:24 01/01/02 (1)

Re: Hey! It's stinkpit Jimmy! - CarlEber 04:34:31 01/02/02 (0)

Re: Uh huh... - Rich 06:59:41 12/27/01 (1)

Re: Uh huh... - CarlEber 19:01:29 12/30/01 (0)

Re: Why is 2.35:1 so overused on DVDs? - Rich 21:15:58 12/20/01 (3)

Rich Morgan - CarlEber 01:04:23 12/21/01 (2)

Re: Rich Morgan - Joe S 08:32:14 12/21/01 (1)

I feel so special! - CarlEber 02:44:15 12/23/01 (0)

The Final Word: - Thom P 02:14:53 12/20/01 (5)

Re: The Final Word: - CarlEber 04:12:30 12/20/01 (4)

Re: The Final Word: - Rich 17:06:09 12/22/01 (3)

Not quite - CarlEber 02:55:33 12/23/01 (2)

Tatersall's reply... - Rich 11:42:47 12/23/01 (1)

In yur dreams Morgan... - CarlEber 20:56:05 12/24/01 (0)

Re: Why is 2.35:1 so overused on DVDs? - xenon101 10:36:41 12/19/01 (3)

Thank you... - CarlEber 20:20:39 12/19/01 (0)

Phantom Menace... - Rich 11:50:36 12/19/01 (1)

It's good to know that Rich was there during production (nt) - CarlEber 20:21:52 12/19/01 (0)

Re: Why is 2.35:1 so overused on DVDs? - xenon101 06:37:56 12/19/01 (2)

Lawrence of Arabia - more information - xenon101 10:03:40 12/19/01 (1)

I can't thank you enough for this insight! - CarlEber 20:24:14 12/19/01 (0)

Apparently, no one is intelligent enough... - CarlEber 17:53:17 12/18/01 (10)

Re: Apparently, no one is intelligent enough... - xenon101 19:10:27 12/19/01 (1)

Thank you again... - CarlEber 20:40:17 12/19/01 (0)

Re: Apparently, no one is intelligent enough... - Rich 05:35:59 12/19/01 (1)

<shrug> (nt) - CarlEber 19:17:59 12/19/01 (0)

Re: Apparently, no one is intelligent enough... - Thom P 02:46:20 12/19/01 (1)

Alrighty then... - CarlEber 04:21:15 12/19/01 (0)

Re: Apparently, no one is intelligent enough... - GaryM 18:46:26 12/18/01 (3)

Fine... - CarlEber 03:39:43 12/19/01 (2)

Re: Fine... - GaryM 07:54:44 12/24/01 (1)

Re: Fine... - CarlEber 20:51:01 12/24/01 (0)

Re: Why is 2.35:1 so overused on DVDs? - Dman 08:37:22 12/18/01 (4)

Thanks - CarlEber 19:20:48 12/19/01 (0)

Read my post again.... - CarlEber 17:03:40 12/18/01 (2)

Re: Read my post again.... - Dman 10:20:18 12/19/01 (1)

That's true... - CarlEber 19:28:16 12/19/01 (0)

According to IMDb the original aspect ratio of Phantom Menace was 2.35:1 (nt) - Thom P 01:42:11 12/18/01 (3)

Re: According to IMDb the original aspect ratio of Phantom Menace was 2.35:1 (nt) - CarlEber 17:05:18 12/18/01 (2)

Or... - Rich 05:38:43 12/19/01 (1)

<yawn> (nt) - CarlEber 19:25:07 12/19/01 (0)

I'd... - Rich 23:21:25 12/17/01 (1)

Re: I'd... - CarlEber 17:08:45 12/18/01 (0)

Re: Why is 2.35:1 so overused on DVDs? - kotches 21:05:04 12/17/01 (7)

Actually... - CarlEber 17:20:33 12/18/01 (6)

Re: Actually... - Joe S 08:27:32 12/19/01 (1)

Sure... - CarlEber 20:28:19 12/19/01 (0)

Re: Actually... - kotches 22:00:39 12/18/01 (3)

Re: Actually... - CarlEber 04:39:03 12/19/01 (2)

Re: Actually... - kotches 05:14:29 12/19/01 (1)

Indeed, but that wasn't my point... - CarlEber 20:07:36 12/19/01 (0)

Follow Ups

According to IMDb the original aspect ratio of Phantom Menace was 2.35:1 (nt) - Thom P 01:42:11 12/18/01 (3)

Re: According to IMDb the original aspect ratio of Phantom Menace was 2.35:1 (nt) - CarlEber 17:05:18 12/18/01 (2)

Or... - Rich 05:38:43 12/19/01 (1)

<yawn> (nt) - CarlEber 19:25:07 12/19/01 (0)