![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
69.136.244.80
'); } // End --> |
It wasn't enough just to have that piece of crap around... they had to issue it on HD DVD...Thanks... boys!
![]()
![]()
It was one of the first to be on DVD here in Europe.
Also one of the greatest nothing of all time.
![]()
Sorry...I like the movie...mindless entertainment on a Sat. afternoon with my son...the Jean-Paul Gaultier costumes are great as are the special effects and some of the dialogue is a riot...BIG BADDA BOOM....not all films are to be taken seriously, some are for pure entertainment value! Get over it!
![]()
That YOU did not wrote down below?
In one word, you missed a good occasion to stay quite.....
![]()
...that you don't realize it is crap.Nothing wrong with some mindless entertainment, and no matter the volume of your red herring no one ever suggested otherwise.
But crap remains crap, even if we sometimes like it. There are many crappy movies which I enjoyed, and some of them - more than once.
![]()
![]()
along with Fifth Element I might add.
Music is Emotion
![]()
I won't say that it's crap...because I don't think so... it does IMO have redeeming qualities which sets it above say something like Planet of the Apes (the remake) which I do think was crap... now I'm sure someone will dogpile on me and tell me I'm full of it...that they like that movie...but IMO it was crap and I (as a rule) like Tim Burton's movies....You see what I mean, everyone's mileage will vary....
![]()
That you like a movie someone else doesn't should not bother you, or me... or anyone else. Heck, there is someone who claimed the 8 1/2 was crap... so what? I still love that film. Only fools get defensive when someone doesn't share their choices.But that was not my point. It was, rather, that we all can enjoy the lowly entertainment, like we can enjoy Coca Cola now and then, knowing full well it is not good in any sense and we should drink something wholesome instead.
![]()
![]()
I also often wondered... what caused so many to fall in love with that atrocious diva scene? Good music? Lack of exposure to classical opera?It sounds to me one could get any number of Franco Zeffirelli opera films and get the REAL thing... "Callas Forever"... Don Carlo... Otello... Pagliacci... La Traviata... this is just scratching the surface.
![]()
![]()
This pure half way synthetic voice makes me shivering, a kind of anti climax down my spine...
And worse, it was on all Hi-fi shows for years in Germany...And much " boum-boum ". And what a bad playing.
A nightmare.
A living one.When you compare it( can we ) to " Blade runner " there is such a difference!
![]()
Sometimes I wonder... what is all that flock mentality?About ten years ago you could not walk through the Hi-Fi show without hearing Spanish Harlem play in every room. Five years ago it was that dumb diva everywhere.
I recall how, years ago, in the middle of that that crap I stumbled over the Shun Mook room, and there the monk was playing Mozart's 17th piano concerto - one of my favorites... I can't express how grateful I was for those minutes of refuge...
And if that makes me not a videophile... or audiophile, for that matter, then so be it!
![]()
![]()
It was the celebration of "video meets pseudo Hi-Fi ".
Spanish Harlem was cool when compared to that crap! At least it was some kind of moderate...
Like jazz at the Pawshop another anti-musical anti-climax...Refuge? That is in truth the right word.
Like escaping....Ha-ha!
![]()
Too bad the industry had to kill its delicate soul.Years ago one reviewer said about "audiophile" recordings something like "good recordings of something I don't want to hear"... so true.
And now we are going through the same with all that HD DVD hoopla...
![]()
![]()
Last page of the last TAS...Many truths...
![]()
I figured that The Fifth Element was the kind of silly grey poupon mustard that would be right up your alley! (~B^D)Then again, it IS science fiction cinema, albeit ridiculously camp, but at the same time it's highly European in flavor, so I guess you have to denounce this flick even if it's a guilty pleasure, don't you? ;^)
I agree!
I hated it, too, when I first saw it....cliché after hysterical cliché but maybe I was expecting something a little 'finer'.
![]()
I don't see why.
Toy Story 2. Pure digital to digital transfer, hardly any compression artifacts, and a better than life color pallet. If a display device can handle it without choking, it's set up pretty well. Granted, there are no flesh tones or blue skys to key off of, but I've seen RPTV's that look fine with live action film look fuzzy and bleed color on Toy Story. After further calibration to fix the problems with T.S.2, the live action films looked even better.It's imminently more watchable than the Fifth Element as well. "It's the chicken man!" Hehe.
Monsters, Inc. is also a good reference, an equally good transfer as well as loads of well recorded acoustic jazz for the audio guys to enjoy.
/*Music is subjective. Sound is not.*/
![]()
I never understood why, either. Heck, if somebody wants eye candy, what about something like Baraka? Not only was it shot on 70mm, it's also a good film.In my experience with the AVS Forum years ago, I got the feeling most of those guys were interested in image quality more so than film quality.
-Anthony
In my experience with the AVS Forum years ago, I got the feeling most of those guys were interested in image quality more so than film quality.Just a feeling? It's been a lot more blatant to me than that. It's specifically why I go there every once in awhile.
In regards to Fifth Element, I would have enjoyed it more if it weren't for Chris Tucker. I don't think even he liked his own performance.
But why Fifth Element for videophiling? Is it because the visual style always shoots for as much ΔE in one frame? Is it the brief glimpse of anorexic girl flesh?
"Just a feeling? It's been a lot more blatant to me than that."I was being nice :)
After all, the AVS forum was a good resource when I was trying to gather as much information as possible about video projectors. Now that I have one, I could hardly be less interested in reading about video equipment. Strange, huh?
-Anthony
.
![]()
You mostly said the same things I posted in response to Jack G.Scary...
***Now that I have one, I could hardly be less interested in reading about video equipment. Strange, huh?
I say - normal.
![]()
![]()
d
![]()
> > > In my experience with the AVS Forum years ago, I got the feeling most of those guys were interested in image quality more so than film quality. < < <
Videophiles interested in picture quality? WHO'LD A THUNK IT?
Next you'll be claiming audiophiles are interested in sound quality.
Jack
![]()
My point is that with the majority of videophiles, picture size and quality seems to be a means to its own end. A greater percetage of audiophiles on the other hand started out with a love of music, regardless of fidelity.-Anthony
Does that mean you'll sell your system for a Bose wave? Do you know any audiophiles that will worry about the soundstage while tweaking a system? Do you know anyone who ever spend a day swapping power chords to see which sounds best? How about swapping tubes? Both hobbies can have their extremes, but that's not the norm and they are very similar.
Most videophiles love watching movies (and sometimes TV), and the system is just a way to maximize that enjoyment. Just like audiophiles and their systems. I see them as flip sides of the same coin.
Jack
![]()
In my original post I wrote, "In my experience with the AVS Forum years ago, I got the feeling most of those guys were interested in image quality more so than film quality."By "film quality," I meant GOOD films, not the multi-million dollar visual spectacles that videophiles seem to be crazy about. It's less common to find audiophiles who listen primarily to a handful of sonic spectaculars.
As far as the audio video debate goes, I agree with Victor... but that's another subject.
My point was, that many audiophiles will choose sound and recording quality over quality of the music. The old joke is, if it *sounds* good, the music must suck.
Tell the truth, would you rather watch your favorite movie on a 23" B&W Tv or a 50" plasma?
Jack
![]()
It is not really a question of a 23" B&W vs. plasma... no one would argue such silly thing. It is a question of what role do those decisions play in your life. If you buy the plasma and then forget about it, simply start enjoing movies it is one thing. If you spend thousands on having it calibrated, set up, upgraded, replaced, etc, etc, etc, and constantly reading about better TV's then it is something different.I bought a plasma years ago, and never since then had any bug about learning about new models... about upgrading... knowing full well the technology had moved great deal. It just doesn't bother me one bit, as what I have is good enough for my image flipping, plus some.
When it breaks I will replace it with a modern version, whatever will be modern at that time, but I will not even read any reviews - not now, not when time comes to replace it. When I bought it I simply asked one guy, and he happened to have this one at a good price. Deal!
So I don't know what bin you put me in... I love movies... and I do not care much about image quality... as long as it is... well... adequate.
![]()
![]()
You are probably amoung the largest group of people where you want quality and buy it then its done. Above Joe sixpack who buys into the flash, but not the obsessive hobbyist. I'm in that group, but *closer* to the hobbyist side. When I bought my set, I had to promise my wife I wouldn't treat it like I used to treat audio. I'll keep this set until it dies.
Jack
![]()
There have been numerous studies all affirming that humans receive and process visual and audio information differently, with video one being, in somewhat simplistic terms, more primitive in terms of response and processing. Things like TV channel flipping are to some degree result of that insatiable appetite for quickly changing images, and so are the commercials. There is no such analog in audio world.So as I said before, I see all such alanogies between video and audio realms as completely and fundamentally flawed.
![]()
![]()
The *hobbyists* are very similar. Videophiles think of their system along similar lines as audiophiles think of theirs. I've noticed with the fast growth of the HT/video industry, quite a few audiophiles are becoming videophiles.
Jack
![]()
Yes, you can say that a crazy hobbyists exist in every field, that is true, but still there are different hobbies that address different parts of the brain. One can be a crazy foodball nut, or a book worm, and those who, while sharing passion, do not do similar things to the "nut" brain.It is not elitism to suggest that love of images is lower on totem pole than appreciation of sounds, as the sounds always mean more brain processing, while the images go immediately to the spinal cord, if you will.
That is why people are so easily hooked on images, witness multiple TV's in every home, with sounds always playing much more modest role.
Movies represent an interesting case. They start dangerously close to flickering images, but the good ones quickly evolve into cerebral exercise, where images begin to play secondary role, and other attributes take importance... hence my soft disdain for image quailty in movies.
![]()
![]()
Oh Victor! I love that movie. It's funny, fast paced and I never tire of the Diva scene. I've got the SuperBit DVD and it looks great.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: