|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
98.207.233.232
It's a beautiful film.
Its visual energy is driven by the story.
This is what Aronofsky does, and he does it again.
He's a director striving for a total reality.
A storyteller of epic quality.
SF
Follow Ups:
...pretty bad.
But the effects were interesting.
It's been a while since I saw it, but I recall it not making a whole lot of sense.
And I probably found more to like in the film because I "wanted" to like it.
The themes of time travel and immortality were presented in a novel way that really appealed to the sci-fi nut in me.
If one takes the story "literally", as in all three parts of the timeline actually occurring within the "world" of the story, I think the film acqires more of an epic flavor.
If one sees the middle story as the "real", and the other two as metaphoric creations of the characters, then the movie simply becomes an existential love-story, with nothing happening outside the realm of mundane reality.
And, as I stated in my OP, it was a beautiful film to look at.
Plus, Rachel Weisz is hot.
Regards,
SF
or one doesn't. If you do (and I do) it's a beautiful - albeit flawed - film and if you don't I could see where it would be extremely difficult to get into much less enjoy.
"You can safely assume you have created God in your own image when he hates all the same people you do."
Plus, Rachel Weisz is hot.
Agreed :-P
I haven't seen the movie yet, but I downloaded the soundtrack...very interesting.
I thought the movie sucked.
.
Complicit Constapo Talibangelical since MMIII
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: