![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
67.171.224.134
In Reply to: RE: 2012... Sorry to bring this up again... posted by SF tech on July 22, 2010 at 12:07:42
Woody Harrelson's character is ridiculously over the top and a hoot. Cusack is his goofy hero best. But the reason for all of this is pure escapism: great special effects loosely tied together with a story with a believable premise--- but who cares?
It's great entertainment, like a circus for the visually addicted.
Also, it goes by FAR faster than the pretentious "Inception."
Bonus: no Ellen Page.
Follow Ups:
I especially loved seeing huge chunks of Fascistfornia fall into the ocean with I-hope-millions of the pinko-hypocrate-liberals who populate it.
"Bonus: no Ellen Page."? Wow. I thought she was very good in 'Inception', which I also much enjoyed. I felt she looked ...er...feeble... early in the movie with her hair tight on her head and drooping; she looks much better--and VERY nice--later in the film with her hair up.
'2012' and 'Inception' are both very good films OF THEIR OWN TYPE, the former being a highly entertaining fantasy-disaster flic and a fine excuse to eat lots of popcorn.
-------------------------------------------------------
Tin-eared audiofool and terrible competitive-pistol shootist.
http://community.webshots.com/user/jeffreybehr
Let's start here: "Woody Harrelson's character is ridiculously over the top and a hoot."
I disagree, Woody is a barely tolerable asshat in every film he's been in except for Kingpin and No Country For Old Men.
"...a story with a believable premise---"
You're dead wrong on this one... Neutrinos suddenly acquire mass for no reason? They didn't even offer a bullshit explanation.
"goes by FAR faster than the pretentious "Inception."
Haven't seen that "masterpiece" yet.
"...this film has a sense of humor (which you don't)."
Au contraire! I found myself laughing at the sheer stupidity of 2012 multiple times... That's a nice way for you to get a cheap shot in, though.
SF
![]()
expected "Hamlet," I could understand your disappointment.
Hint: It's a Disaster film.
Expect hokey plot.
Expect lots of destruction.
Expect strange characters.
It was far, far superior to Cruise's, "War of the Worlds." That bomb wasn't even ironically funny....
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: