![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
62.227.238.54
Esthetic on the Italian way, a bit Cat on the US tin roof.
Excellent acting.
-Hypersexuel like only Homosexuels or Playboys can be. A deadly sauce of homosexual cliches and actors.
After the middle of it it is so deceiving, and sirupy.
Pretentiously bad.
Follow Ups:
![]()
Shortly after I saw the movie I discovered that the 1949 John Lautner house it was shot in was up for sale for almost $1.5M. It appears it may still be on the market. More info at the link below.
Edits: 02/24/11
What was this film with also an interesting house not unlike this one, about two lovers who lives in a different period of time, but who somehow meet?
![]()
![]()
![]()
Stills from a movie called "The Lake House" with Sandra Bullock and Keanu Reeves.
A very very bad film but a most interesting house.
Thank you.
fds
nt
You can't live in such a house, especially at night.
![]()
Why? because I Wonder why I could not and some can.
In a single man there is scene ( endless ) where the hero is sitting on his toilet and while shitting, escuse me the ..) he must do some contorsion to escape the view of a neighbor.
I suppose through his duck and hide contorsion it ease up his belly more easily.
Now it is still interesting...But more from the outside...
fds
We have a neighbor whose house has wall of glass. Needless to say there are always closed drapes.
What's the point?
![]()
light and privacy. I live in somewhat of an aquarium. No problem.
way. A great period for American home architecture.
.
![]()
true, the film was very looooong on style. Beautifully done and not so "gay" that homophobes would burn down the theater or smash the tele.
![]()
Homosexuals keep popping up every where.
Do you have an eye for?
A true political film. Made from an obsession. Pretentious. Empty and when I think of the good critics about, I feel half of them to be pederast.
In the same league than Pasolini as the lust for male body but without any intelligence nor intellectuality.
First was more than good. the set was lavish good old Tom is a top cloths maker.
dfs
My dear it was humour with a prise of truth. Actually more than a prise.
If you have seen the film, you know of what I talk of.
It is an homosexual film for homosexual.
To put it shortly.
BTW, the architecture in the home is one of the few great American art forms that trumps European: mid-century modern architecture, especially for homes.
We went to see it because it was... ahem... a foreign movie. As we entered the theater I knew there was something different about it...
![]()
Would be that way I would complain just the same.
Willing to look in the mirror and ask yourself a few questions? Do you ask of all heterosexual films that they include a gay character? The film bothered you because of its content. I found it lacking because of its quality.
Big difference.
I ask for nothing. I just donīt like films whose contend are like that one. beside the part ( good part ) of Firthīs lost love, by accident and the flash back, who was nicely put into place.
I donīt like all this male encounters ( or women in a hetero film ), this is an obsessive picture handling.
Now if you donīt get it...
df
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: